drewwizard
Airman
- 41
- Dec 31, 2016
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I think Drew is referring to the "Army Zero" (Nakajima Ki-43)....Flying tigers took on japanese Zero?
Never happened
Another thing worth noting is that the Japanese airforces, I have read, had the most stringent confirmation requirements for claims ...
I think Drew is referring to the "Army Zero" (Nakajima Ki-43)....
I highly recommend books written by the pilots on both sides. They tell far more about what challenges the pilots faced. Think about how the P-40's of the flying tigers took on Japanese Zero fighters. The Japanese kept using the same poor tactics with no change to counter the P-40 dive, shoot, and run. Like soldiers marching in rows at Verdun. I am now into books written by Christer Bergstrom who researched the battles down to the pilot level on the eastern front.
That was army type 1
Yes you are correct, and early on it was often called the "Army Zero" :
Nakajima Ki-43 - Wikipedia
The Allied reporting name was "Oscar", but it was often called the "Army Zero" by American pilots because it bore a certain resemblance to the Mitsubishi A6M Zero......
We are in the 2018 we can easily called the fighter with their right name not with fantasy name
Instead of looking at kill ratios vs Allied pilots, which are complicated by improving Allied aircraft, tactics, and pilot quality, and worsening Axis supply situations, what about looking at non-combat losses aircraft losses?
Of the Bf109 JGs that participated in Bodenplatte, they lost 243 due to accidents and had 487 combat losses in Dec 1944. Dec 1 1944 they had 1129 a/c on hand. At month end there was 612 on hand.
Bodenplatte was a little "special", a lot of inexperienced pilots attacking at low level, some accidents were friendly fire by troops unaware that the attack was taking place, others were hitting poles or pigeons while some more were battle damaged planes crashing on landing.A 21 percent accident rate must have gotten the attention of high command. Or were these numbers a common reality this late in the war?