Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
FYI - the correct term for your part would be Left Vertical Stabilzer. The rudder (missing in your photo) is the control surface that moves and is covered in cloth.
I don't believe your part is S9+CK, based on paint color.
View attachment 585655
Messerschmitt Bf 110D3 Zerstorer 2.ErprGr210 (S9+CK) Alfred Habisch WNr 3341 shot down 15 Aug 1940 01
Messerschmitt Bf 110D3 Zerstorer 2.ErprGr210 (S9+CK) Alfred Habisch WNr 3341 shot down 15 Aug 1940 08
Messerschmitt Bf 110D3 Zerstorer 2.ErprGr210 (S9+CK) Alfred Habisch WNr 3341 shot down 15 Aug 1940 13
In this photo you can see the W.Nr. painted to the lower right of the swastika. I can't see any traces of painted numbers on your example.
Messerschmitt Bf 110D3 Zerstorer 2.ErprGr210 (S9+CK) Alfred Habisch WNr 3341 shot down 15 Aug 1940 09
Nice use of some of my photos.
That is because they come out of his books. He is a distinguished writer on this subject.How are the photo's yours? Do you mean they are from a website you may own?
That is because they come out of his books. He is a distinguished writer on this subject.
john vasco me110 - Google Search
Speaking of photos, here are some more from our bf110 vertical stabilizer. Don't know if these help or not. The story is that these were found in a bog in Eastern Europe but I have no actual documentation of their provenance... The parts have been sitting in the museum for years without being displayed. John, I very much appreciate the photos and your expertise. Thanks!Using a copy of a photo in a book and actually "owning" a photo are two different things.
You want to go this way? On the one hand we have a real expert, who has written books, recieved well by his peers and well...you. Do you realley want to start an argument or must we be happy this expert is willing to share? I do not believe he made a point out of it besides remarking he is the primary source of the pictures. Never mind the information delivered with these pictures in his books. Never mind the hours of research for the underscript.Using a copy of a photo in a book and actually "owning" a photo are two different things.
You want to go this way? On the one hand we have a real expert, who has written books, recieved well by his peers and well...you. Do you realley want to start an argument or must we be happy this expert is willing to share? I do not believe he made a point out of it besides remarking he is the primary source of the pictures. Never mind the information delivered with these pictures in his books. Never mind the hours of research for the underscript.
So i suggest in a very friendly manner to give credit were credit is due. Or even better buy some of his books. You will know a lot more on this subject.
MIAG/Luther produced ~200 Bf 110E-2 in 1941 + Luther is listed as producing 32 G-0 preproduction Bf110.
I represent common sence. Now try to behave not like a 6 year old please.Calm down Schnitzel.
My question was directed to John, do you represent him in some way? He indicated some of the photos were his and I simply asked how? I'm sure John can answer for himself if he so chooses.
Buh-Bye
You posted a photo without citation which is against forum rules regardless of who "owns" it.Calm down Schnitzel.
My question was directed to John, do you represent him in some way? He indicated some of the photos were his and I simply asked how? I'm sure John can answer for himself if he so chooses.
Buh-Bye
You posted a photo without citation which is against forum rules regardless of who "owns" it.
And quit being a douchebag.
Using a copy of a photo in a book and actually "owning" a photo are two different things.
Calm down Schnitzel.
My question was directed to John, do you represent him in some way? He indicated some of the photos were his and I simply asked how? I'm sure John can answer for himself if he so chooses.
Buh-Bye
Definitely a Bf 110 rudder. Port side.
How are the photo's yours? Do you mean they are from a website you may own?