Pick you air force ( I am not trying to copy the other one)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

HEAVY BOMBER--- B-29
MEDIUM BOMBER---- P-38L Droop Snoot
LIGHT BOMBER----- P-38L
DIVE BOMBER------- P-38L
FIGHTER BOMBER----------- P-38L
LONGE RANGE FIGHTER---- P-38L
FIGHTER -------------------- P-38K
NIGHT FIGHTER/INERCEPTOR--- P-38M
SEAPLANE------------------- P-38
CARRIER FIGHTER----------P-38 Model 822
CARRIER BOMBER---------- P-38 Model 822
MULTI-ROLE BOMBER------ P-38L
MULTI-ROLE FIGHTER----- P-38L
MULTI-ROLE FIGHTER BOMBER-- P-38L
RECONAISSANCE ---- P-38 F-5
HIGH ALTITUDE FIGHTER ----- P-38L


Wow, something tells me I like the P-38
 
ah but now you see he'll tell you about a version that was designed to have floats for long ferry flights, however it was just a design, there was a lanc designed that had a predicted ceiling of 50,300ft, however i do not claim the lanc is a high altitude bomber, however in CCs mind when it comes to the P-38 if something is so much as thought about it, it could do it and it whould be the best there could possibly be................

and there's no way the P-38 droop snoot was a medium bomber.............
 

You would do the same for the Lanc or anything British.
 
did you even read what i said there?? i gave an example of how i don't do it, there were plans for a lanc with a ceiling of 50,300ft however i do not claim that the lanc had a 50,000+ft ceiling do I.................
 
mosquitoman said:
I don' think it was a seaplane though

And actually there were plans for it.


Other duties that it was experimented with among others:

One of the initial production P-38s had its turbochargers removed, with a secondary cockpit placed in one of the booms to examine how flightcrew would respond to such an "asymmetric" cockpit layout. One P-38E was fitted with an extended central nacelles to accommodate a tandem-seat cockpit with dual controls, and was later fitted with a "laminar-flow" wing.

Still another P-38E was used in 1942 to tow a Waco troop glider as a demonstration. There proved to be plenty of other aircraft, such as Douglas C-47s Dakotas, available to tow gliders, and the Lightning was spared this duty.

An F-5A was modified to an experimental two-seat reconnaissance configuration, with additional cameras in the tail booms.

Standard Lightnings were even used as crew and cargo transports in the South Pacific. They were fitted with pods attached to the underwing pylons, replacing drop tanks or bombs, that could carry a single passenger in a lying-down position or cargo.
This was very uncomfortable way to fly. Some of the pods weren't even fitted with a window to let the victim see out or bring in light. One fellow who hitched a lift on a P-38 in one of these pods later said that whoever designed the damn thing should have been forced to ride in it.


Lockheed proposed a carrier-based "Model 822" version of the Lightning for the US Navy. The Model 822 would have featured folding wings, an arresting hook, and stronger undercarriage for carrier operations. The Navy wasn't interested, as they regarded the Lightning as too big for carrier operations and didn't like liquid-cooled engines anyway, and the Model 822 never went beyond the paper stage. However, the Navy did operate four land-based F-5Bs in North Africa, with these aircraft inherited from the USAAF and redesignated "FO-1".

A single P-38G was captured intact by the Italians during the war when the pilot landed at an Italian base by mistake, and this Lightning was flown in combat against Allied aircraft, but this aircraft was quickly grounded due to lack of parts. Two Lightnings that were forced to land in Lisbon, Portugal, while on a ferry flight from England to Algeria were interned and operated by the Portugese, apparently with American blessing.

A P-38J was used in experiments with an unusual scheme for mid-air refueling, in which the fighter snagged a drop tank trailed on a cable from a bomber! Astonishingly, they got this to work, but unsurprisingly decided it wasn't practical. A P-38J was also fitted with experimental retractable snow ski landing gear, but this idea never reached operational service, either.

A P-38L was modified by Hindustan Aircraft in India as a fast VIP transport, with a comfortable seat in the nose, leather-lined walls, accommodations for "refreshments", and a glazed nose to give the passenger a spectacular view.

After the war, a P-38L was experimentally fitted with armament of three 15.2 millimeter (0.60 caliber) machine guns. This sounds like a misprint, but such guns were actually developed. The 15.2 millimeter cartridge had been developed early in the war for an infantry "anti-tank rifle", a type of weapon developed by a number of nations in the 1930s when tanks were lighter, but by 1942 the idea of taking on a tank with a large-caliber rifle was somewhere between "outdated" and "suicidal".
The cartridge wasn't abandoned, with the Americans designing a derivative of the German MG-151 15 millimeter machine gun around it and designating the weapon the "T17", but though 300 of these guns were built and over six million 15.2 millimeter rounds were manufactured, they never worked out all the bugs, and the T17 never saw operational service. The cartridge was "necked up" to fit 20 millimeter projectiles and became a standard US ammunition after the war. The T17-armed P-38L did not go beyond unsuccessful trials.


Another P-38L was modified after the war as a "super strafer", with eight 12.7 millimeter machine guns in the nose and a pod under each wing with two 12.7 millimeter guns, for a total of twelve. Nothing came of this fit, either.

 

Users who are viewing this thread