- Thread starter
- #101
Snautzer01
Marshal
- 46,292
- Mar 26, 2007
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Both sets have the same cardinality ("size"), since they are isomorphic, i.e. can be mapped on to each other one-to-one in a way that is order preserving. Both are aleph_0 (ℵ0 ) in size = cardinality. They are both "denumberable" sets. There are an "infinite" number of different sizes of non-finite sets. Non-finite sets are the only sets wherein a proper subset of another set (a subset that is missing some elements of the containing set) can have the same cardinality as the containing set. This cannot happen in finite sets. You can't apply normal "finite" methods to "non-finite" sets. Check the Wiki page for "Georg Cantor". He was the first mathemetician to explore this subject and now his work is part of the foundations of mathematics, i.e. the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms.View attachment 826790
Math. Natural numbers vs square ones.
Being in doubt proves your existence.I doubt my existence even further.
It's just a numbers game.I knew math was not "my subject", now I'm certain.