Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
There is a momentary toggle switch on the P-40 instrument panel. Once in constant-speed mode, if you push it upward, the rpm goes up by 200 and you release it and it returns to center. If you push it downward and release it, the rpm goes down by 200 rpm. On the day in question, the density altitude was probably above 6,500 feet and the P-40E was fast.
It was essentially a stock P-40E that belongs to John Paul and was being flown by his son at the time. His machine is about as "stock" as it gets, and flies regularly.
A key factor in the P-40's success in the Western Desert was numbers. They had sent Hurricanes in mere dribs and drabs to the Middle East but when the Hawk 81A Tomahawks arrived it was in squadron and wing strength. Those airplanes were not needed to defend the U.K. and they felt free to use them in numbers. The Germans in the theater were almost always heavily outnumbered after that. The Hurricane PR guys even went over to the new Tomahawk units and asked to coordinate their efforts to enable the P-40 fighter sweeps to give them some support.
When the Palm Sunday Massacure occurred they had four squadrons of USAAF Warhawks escorted by RAF Spitfires that attacked 90 Ju-52's escorted by BF-109's. They shot down 59 Ju-52's and 16 BF-109's while losing only 6 P-40's. The RAF escorting Spitfire losses were actually greater, I think. So there you have it. A overwhelming force of P-40's escorted by Spitfires did a great job - but the Warhawks had to be escorted by better air to air fighters for that to occur. I guess that is "learning how to use the airplane effectively."
A key factor in the P-40's success in the Western Desert was numbers.
This is from a 2011 book, "P-40 Warhawk vs Bf 109 MTO 1942 - 44" by Carl Molesworth...
If the 56th had been flying Spit V and IX that day they would have scored even higher kills - assuming the Spits had enough fuel to hang around. They needed the Spits as top cover because the P-40 could not hack it. Some 109's made it down to try to get the P-40's off the JU-52's, no doubt tried to turn with a P-40, and got clobbered. The Spits scored far fewer kills, and none of the Ju-52's because they were totally engaged with keeping the 109's busy.
If that top cover had been P-40's instead of Spits the American losses would have been far greater and the kills far fewer, even though they had 40 to 60 fighters.
That the P-40 was successfull versus the 109 in MTO is a myth
I have the same book, it's a good one. But comparing those two lists is a little misleading for a couple of reasons -
The Allied Aces listed there only include the American pilots.
The Americans were only active in relatively small numbers and some only for a few months, compared to as much as 3 years for the Commonwealth pilots.
Those German Aces scored most of their victories against British or Commonwealth pilots flying older model planes
Many of their victories (for example of Marseilles) made claims for P-40s when they actually got Hurricanes.
Here is a partial list of Commonwealth Aces who flew the P-40 (there are 23 more):
No / Name / Total / P-40 / Nation
1 Neville Duke 27 UK (8-10 in KIttyhawk and Tomahawk)
2 Clive Caldwell 26 20 Aus
3 Billy Drake 24.5 13 UK
4 James Francis "Stocky" Edwards 19 12 Can
5 R J C Whittle 11 11 Aus
6 Keith Truscott 17 Aus
7 John Lloyd Waddy 15 11 Aus (first 12 kills in P-40, more in Spitfires)
8 Andrew "Nicky" Barr 12.5 Aus
9 Peter Turnbill 12 Aus (5 kills on P-40 in Med, 3 kills in Pacific)
10 Geoff Fiskin 11 NZ
11 Bobby Gibbes 10.5 Aus
12 N Bowker 10 9 UK
13 D W Golding 8 8 SA
14 E C Saville 8 8 SA
15 J E Frost 14 7 SA
16 M S Hards 7 7 UK
17 A C Bosman 8 6 SA
18 A C Cameron 6 6 Aus
19 O V Hanbury 10 6 UK
20 R M Leu 6 6 UK
21 Wilfred Arthur 10 Aus (4 kills in one sortie in Med, also fought in
Pacific)
Minor nitpick but Fisken only had 5 kills while flying P-40s.