The coming $26 billion windfall for the Canadian Armed Forces. What to buy?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I tend to agree. Also, looking at loss rates would be useful: how do, say, the F-16 and F-18 compare? Neglecting a couple of early F-18s where one engine performed partial self-disassembly and fodded the other, there have been several F-18s operating from land lost after a single engine failure. I don't know whether the loss was due to some sort of cascading failure, operating at too great a weight or flaws in training, but it does little good for the argument in favor of twin engine safety.

As a somewhat irrelevant aside, when I was active in the helicopter industry, twin-turbine helicopters' loss rate was driven by a common failure mode: the transmission. Twin helicopters had a significantly higher rate of transmission failure than did singles.
 
Last edited:
One of the problems groups like SIPRI have comparing defense budgets is what different countries throw into the mix. In the US, defense costs include chunks of the Dept of Energy budget, arguably the entire VA budget, and chunks of the budget for the NRO, Coast Guard, and NSA. How does one count the French Gendarmes and Italian Carabinieri, which are largely police forces but are under the defense budgets of those countries?
 

Users who are viewing this thread