Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The aircraft industries in all combatant countries were businesses. All the governments struggled to a greater or lesser extent to impose control over those businesses. The individual businesses that composed the aircraft industries were not in it specifically to win the war (though they would all have seen this as desirable on economic grounds) they were in it to win contracts and make money for their shareholders.
Wartime government contracts were a bonanza for these industries and gave them the opportunity to squander eye watering amounts of public, i.e. taxpayers money. I believe Howard Hughes gave a figure of many billions of dollars which he believed had been wasted by various US aviation companies on unsuccessful and incompleted projects throughout the war.
Cheers
Steve
Now I am getting that Pilots were the bottleneck?
If more planes can be produced faster than pilots....
i would like to see the numbers on that. not saying it isnt true....but at the beginning of the war it might have been more the case. when the war began the army ac wanted college grads as pilots. my father was in one of the first groups "fast tracked"....he quit high school after being given the chance and went to be a cadet ( fall 1943 ). they gave an assessment and took 300 recruits from the pittsburgh area. he was in advanced flight training with guys who had been in the military ( after college) for over a year. by the end of the war there were guys stationed in the us waiting a long time to get to europe. one of the guys i know had over 600 hours before he was deployed and was afraid the war would be over before he got there. so towards the end....they had a wealth of pilots even though the production lines were cranking out planes as well.
i've always wondered how many times did US ground crews get crates full of P51 parts when they needed P40 parts? or needed mechanics to work of P47's when all they could find were P38 mechanics.
A Toyota mechanic can work on a Ford but would not be familiar with the idiosyncrasies of the Ford.
Substitute "USA" with "Luftwaffe" in the beginning post and you will be on the right track!
How do you figure that?
During 1939 the Ju-88 program amounted to over 50% of the entire German airframe workforce. Me-109 was their only mass produced fighter aircraft. For all practical purposes Germany bet their air war on only two aircraft types.
German airframe workforce
Do you have evidence of that?
As far as a "P-38 mechanic" vs. a "P-47 mechanic," there really isn't much of a difference. Once a mechanic received general training he may have been assigned to work on a specific airframe but for the most part, with a little training, maintenance personnel were very interchangeable. "A plane is a plane is a plane." When doing line maintenance it's easy to go from one airframe to another.
Even in the auto industry, a mechanic can work on a Volkswagon Type 1 just as easily as he can work on a V-8 or L-6.i'm not very mechanical, i would have thought that working one a radial engine would be quit a bit different for an inline.
Do you have evidence of that?
As far as a "P-38 mechanic" vs. a "P-47 mechanic," there really isn't much of a difference. Once a mechanic received general training he may have been assigned to work on a specific airframe but for the most part, with a little training, maintenance personnel were very interchangeable. "A plane is a plane is a plane." When doing line maintenance it's easy to go from one airframe to another.