What 9 cy. radial engined fighter did better in WW2? (1 Viewer)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Vincenzo

Senior Master Sergeant
3,059
484
Dec 24, 2007
Ciociaria
Reading some replies on the top 3 engines of 1940 thread i came out with this question


i try to help with a list of 9 cylinders radial engined fighters, i hope have not miss many ;)

PZL P.7 [Bristol Jupiter] (Polish Campaign '39)
PZL P.11 [Bristol Mercury, polish, Gnome Rhone 9k rumenian], (Polish Campaing '39, Russian Campaign '41)
Blackburn Skua [Bristol Mercury], (Naval dive bomber/fighter 39-41)
Blackburn Roc [Bristol Mercury],(Naval fighter 40)
Gloster Gauntlet [Bristol Mercury], (East Africa Campaign '40)
Gloster Gladiator [Bristol Mercury], (many in 39-41)
Fokker D.XXI [Bristol Mercury, finish built get also the P&W R-1535 but at time were recce/trainer plane], (West front '40, Winter War, Russian Campaign '41)
Grumman Wildcat (only Martlet I, IV and FM-2 variants) [Wright R-1820] (Naval fighter carrier or land based from Christmas '40 to war end)
Curtiss Hawk III [Wright R-1820], (China War -40, Thai -41)
Curtiss CW-21 [Wright R-1820], (China&South East Asia 41-42)
Curtiss Hawk 75 (only A-4, -5, -7, -9 variants, -4, 5, 9 also known as Mohawk IV) [Wright R-1820] (many in 40- war end)
Brewster Buffalo [Wright R-1820], (various 41-to end of war)
Boeing P-26 [P&W R-1340], (Philippines 41)
Polikarpov I-15 [Wright R-1820], (Russian Campaign 41-42)
Polikarpov I-153[Shvetsov M-62, Wright R-1820 deevelopment], (Russian Campaign 41-43, China -43)
Polikarpov I-16 [Wright R-1820, Shvetsov M-6263], (Russian campaign 41-?, China -42)
Type 96 carrier based fighter [Nakajima Kotobuki, Jupiter development], (East Asia 41-42, China -41)
Army Type 97 fighter [Nakajima Kotobuki, Jupiter development], (China -43, Manchuria 45, East Asia 41-43)

twin engined
Bristol Blenheim (IF&IVF variant) [Bristol Mercury], (-41?)
Fokker G.I [only Bristol Mercury variant], (Western front '40)
 
Last edited:
How are we defining "did better"? I agree that the FM-2 variant of the Wildcat will certainly be up there. But the other contenders will largely depend on the metrics we use to define "better" - Combat ratio? Airframe performance? Operational impact? Duration of front-line use? Mission flexibility? etc etc etc.
 
Also, we're missing a few other fighter types from the list - Skua/Roc, NA-50/P-64, Blenheim MkIf/IVf, Fokker G1 (the latter 2 clearly don't count if the intent is only to compare single-engined fighters, but that criteria was explicitly mentioned in the OP).
 
did better tell 66% combat ratio (with fighter vs fighter accent) (not claim) 33% operational impact, not a comparation within the 9 cy. engined fighters

i miss the types in your list, and i just not thinked to twin engined, but the P-64 afaik they not combat in WW2 (i know the NA-50 fight the Ecuador Peru war but it's not WW2, neither related to WW2)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back