vinnye
Senior Airman
After WW1 Germany is prohibited from owning and / or developing tanks. (I know they worked with Russia later).
Russia - In the early 1930-'s buy Christies tanks to evaluate = copy! From this they develop BT5 = faster than Vickers Medium ii, 45mm main gun, and has better armour which appears to be sloped!
America goes into Isolation - apart from Christies independent work. Which results in the best suspension system for years to come. It also has speed, and appears to have sloping armour!
France develops heavy tanks - Char B - which has two main drawbacks - small one man turret with machine gun or small calbre gun and main armament is in hull.
It is quite well armoured and fairly mobile. It does also appear to have sloping armour!
Britain in the 1920's produces Vickers Medium Mk II - which has a large turret (5 man crew)- sloping armour and fast and reliable. 47 mm gun in turret and has a radio.
But then goes backwards during the 1930's by producing the Matilda 1 - a throwback ti Infantry Support tanks of WW1 = armour is thick, but tank is slow and has only a nachine gun.
Fuller, Lidl-Hart tactics are being developed for combined armour and infantry attacks - also to incorporate air power.
The German tanks developed were class leading at the outbreak of WWii - along with tactics.
PanzerIII - 15 tons, 37mm gun, 3 man turret, lightly armoured, but scope for development.
Panzer IV- short barrel 75mm, 3 man turret, lightly armoured, but scope for development.
But, there were far more obsolete Panzer I and Panzer II tanks at the onset of WWII.
So what would have happened if Britain had continued along the Vickers Medium Mk II instead of going backwards to the Matilda?
Russia - In the early 1930-'s buy Christies tanks to evaluate = copy! From this they develop BT5 = faster than Vickers Medium ii, 45mm main gun, and has better armour which appears to be sloped!
America goes into Isolation - apart from Christies independent work. Which results in the best suspension system for years to come. It also has speed, and appears to have sloping armour!
France develops heavy tanks - Char B - which has two main drawbacks - small one man turret with machine gun or small calbre gun and main armament is in hull.
It is quite well armoured and fairly mobile. It does also appear to have sloping armour!
Britain in the 1920's produces Vickers Medium Mk II - which has a large turret (5 man crew)- sloping armour and fast and reliable. 47 mm gun in turret and has a radio.
But then goes backwards during the 1930's by producing the Matilda 1 - a throwback ti Infantry Support tanks of WW1 = armour is thick, but tank is slow and has only a nachine gun.
Fuller, Lidl-Hart tactics are being developed for combined armour and infantry attacks - also to incorporate air power.
The German tanks developed were class leading at the outbreak of WWii - along with tactics.
PanzerIII - 15 tons, 37mm gun, 3 man turret, lightly armoured, but scope for development.
Panzer IV- short barrel 75mm, 3 man turret, lightly armoured, but scope for development.
But, there were far more obsolete Panzer I and Panzer II tanks at the onset of WWII.
So what would have happened if Britain had continued along the Vickers Medium Mk II instead of going backwards to the Matilda?