What is the most dangerous position on a bomber? (cont.)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Sadly, that makes sense!
 
What about the radio operator? And the guns may sound nice and give the gunner a sense of a protection, but in reality they are going to do little against a full armoured and armed Fw-190.
 
I dunno about the radio operator there pD, weren't they completely surrounded by metal and in the center of the aircraft, at least in the B17? I would think the tail gunner would be most susceptible to fighter aircraft and the bombardier would take the most flak, due to being lead.
 
I would say the belly gunner, mainy because this guy is basically praying that the big ball of plexi-glass his body is surrounded by doesnt shatter leaving him (if not strapped in) to fall to his death, he is also pretty close to the bomb load, if the bomb load was to go off it would take out the whole plane but if there was slight chance that a creww member was to survive a triggering of the bomb load it sure as hell wouldnt be the belly dancer.

And this guy probably got just as much flak as the the guy up front.
 
I can understand where Jhor is comeing from though. Just sitting in a seat with flak and aircraft shooting at you, can make it seem like the worst seat in the house.
 
The B17 before the addition of the B17G models chin turret, had an 8 ft window from the front where no other gun on the B17 could engage an enemy at 12 oclock headon except for the single B17 nose gun. This was why the luftwaffe pilots learned to attack the B17 from head on, they only had to face one single gun from the nose until the later chin turret was added. So it not only depends on which bomber your question refers to (which you didn't specify) but also on which MODEL of that bomber you refer to. In a B17 with no chin turret, the most dangerous positions were the pilot and co pilot because the enemy pilot was gunning for them, and the bombadier because he was in the nose also. This is supported by statistics for the non chin turret B17 losses.
Bill Akins.
 
Very early on it was realized by both Luftwaffe and IJN pilots that the most vulnerable area of the heavy bomber was the flight deck and they concentrated on above and from-the-front firing passes. The pilot and co-pilot had no gun to fire back no matter how small. And if the plane got damaged they often held her steady while the crew bailed and didn't get out themselves. I'd personally rather not be on the flight deck in a bomber.
 
From my point of view inside the plane is the worst place. Seriously though using the actual casualities of the 95th BG for positions of aircrew of aircraft shot down.

1. Plot and Radio lost 58 men
2. Tail Gunner lost 57 men
3 Co-Pilot, Navigator, and Ball turret 56 men
4. Top Turret lost 51 men Waist lost 102 men
5. Bombardier lost 47 men

This and related info including bomber and fighter losses by the 8th AF can be found at this site. 8th Air Force Combat Losses in World War II ETO Against the AXIS Powers

wmaxt
 
I spoke with a B-17 tail gunner and he said he liked it best because it was warm back there.
Click to expand...

It could become too warm in flight for the relative wind which ineluctably pushes the flames back to the tail , from a fire born in fuselage or wings without dinstinctions.....
 
Good stuff wmaxt, the waist would be roughly double because there was two of them? Looking at that data it looks like they were all almost equally endanger.
 
Looks to me like the ball turret would be extremely dangerous. After all, he was locked in there and couldn't get out without help. I couldn't be the gunner in one of them. I saw a post that said the ball turret position was the safest with that of the pilot being the most dangerous. Guess wmaxt was right.
 
Just think though, for a downed bomber there is less distinction between "safe" and "unsafe." I tend to think of safe and unsafe on bombers that made it back, who was more likely to get killed or come back unscathed. I've heard that the tail gunners, or "Tail End Charlies" as the Lanc rear gunners were called, had the most dangerous positions. You knock out the tail gunner and a huge avenue for attack opens up. I think it would be awful to be the belly gunner as flak is coming straight at you. At least the men in other places had some armor or something more than plexiglass to shield them.
 
yes it is beyond doubt that the rear gunner was the worst position in a lanc, the best being the bomb aimer partly because the main escape hatch was right under him, partly because attach always came from the rear and he was furthest from the rear.........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

What is this?
Replies
11
Views
1K
Geoffrey Sinclair
G
What is a TF-51H?
Replies
14
Views
1K
Tom Fey
T
What was it about the black crosses on the wings that made German aircraft the best?
5 6 7
Replies
123
Views
10K
mikewint
What (or what would) make a good tactical recon aircraft in World War II
Replies
10
Views
1K
ColFord
Brewster Buffalo - what is the verdict?
5 6 7
Replies
134
Views
14K
bf109xxl
Menu
Log in
Register