What Was the worst Aircraft of WWII?
- Thread starter plan_D
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Hot Space
Tech Sergeant
Boom-boom 
Hot Space
Hot Space
Hello Cheddar and Yeomanz!
Well, Cheddar, the rear gun on the Stuka was for the sole purpose of providing the plane with a minimun level of self defense capability against enemy interceptors.
It of course suffered high losses at the hands of the RAF interceptors and was withdrawn from the skies of England.
Just do not get confused, the Stuka inflicted heavy damage to the British during the Battle of Britain. It hit radar stations, dockyards, airfields and sank ships. Its accuracy and destructive power was proved over England as well.
The Stuka took heavy losses since there were times when no Bf109 E´s were available to protect it from the Hurricanes and Spitfires. Had the Emil had a superior range, history might well have been different.
Hey guys! At least half of the speace on this thread is being filled with off-topic issues
I now agree when you told me you are quite relaxed with rules in here.
Cheers!
Well, Cheddar, the rear gun on the Stuka was for the sole purpose of providing the plane with a minimun level of self defense capability against enemy interceptors.
It of course suffered high losses at the hands of the RAF interceptors and was withdrawn from the skies of England.
Just do not get confused, the Stuka inflicted heavy damage to the British during the Battle of Britain. It hit radar stations, dockyards, airfields and sank ships. Its accuracy and destructive power was proved over England as well.
The Stuka took heavy losses since there were times when no Bf109 E´s were available to protect it from the Hurricanes and Spitfires. Had the Emil had a superior range, history might well have been different.
Hey guys! At least half of the speace on this thread is being filled with off-topic issues
I now agree when you told me you are quite relaxed with rules in here.
Cheers!
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
yeah as long as it's not really insulitng and moderatly funny it's ok..............
cheddar cheese
Major General
As long as its NOT moderately funny? 
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
it ceems that way at times but you obviously missread it...............
cheddar cheese
Major General
No I know what you meant, I was just spamming 
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
and so the span ensues..................
cheddar cheese
Major General
Ow, the handcuff marks made them sore enough
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
wow even for you that was random...............
cheddar cheese
Major General
I was replying to the wrist slapping comment by Yeomanz...
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
yeo it is, you may cal me the lanc or the ass, whichever you feel's more appropriate.................
cheddar cheese
Major General
Or man....can I call you man?
cheddar cheese
Major General
to you too then
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
no you cannot................
cheddar cheese
Major General
Wasnay asking you
