Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
What about the Spitfire? well, thats a tough one for me because of my commonwealth and British biases. I cant be as hard on the Spit because of that. But I think I would have to say that Spit had faults of its own. I think they were different though to the hellcats. I think the Spitfire was absolutely necessary to the allies through to 1942, in the same way as the Mustang was from 1944. The allies needed the Spitfire in the early stages to survive. in a defensive war, fighters assume greater importance for obvious reasons, and in reality there was nothing available that could quite do what the Spit was able to do. certainly not the hurricane.
While the Spitfire got the Merlin 45 the Hurricane got the Merlin XX - the 45 using essentially the same supercharger as the XX but with only the one speed.
The Spitfire III was to get the Merlin XX, but these were deemed necessary for the Hurricane. From what I understand the Spitfire III with Merlin XX would have had less of a difficult time against the Fw 190 than the Spitfire V with the Merlin 45.
And when it comes to development, when the Hurricane needs a new wing and there has to be a change-over any production advantages seen previously will be lost.
Also, I don't think the Hurricane fared particularly well against the Bf 109E, and even less so against the Bf 109F.
Any development resources spent on teh Hurricane also detracts from the efforts with the Typhoon.
My point is that the Hurricane would receive both the Merlin 12/45 and XX so that the average Hurricane would receive an upgraded engine (over the Merlin III) sooner than historically.
The Spitfire III airframe was also a factor in it's improved performance, and a Spit III would with Merlin 45 would have outperformed the Spit V.
I don't agree that a wing change would negate any production advantage because the Hurricane was easier to build, and would have been built in multiple facilities (as per the Hurricane and Spitfire in the OTL), so the change could me made in stages until all factories changed over to the new wing design.
The Hurricane might do worse than the Spitfire against the Me109e, but then there are more of them, and they will perform better than the historical Hurricane because they will, on average, have better engines.
The design team that worked on the Spitfire, historically, would be freed to advance other design, including, for example, the Typhoon.
My own feeling is that if the money spent on Spitfire development (and procurement)was instead used to boost Hurricane development and production, that initially, up to about mid 1941, that the net result would have been positive, as more Hurricanes (3 Hurricanes for every two historical Spitfires plus historical Hurricane production), with better access to Merlin engine development (Merlin 12, 45), in a cleaned up Hurricane airframe would have resulted in a stronger RAF.
I doubt that the Hurricane would get the Merlin 45 if they get the XX.
That may be so, but the Merlin XX Spitfire III would outperform a Merlin 45 Spitfire III. And the same if the XX was put into the Spitfire V.
The extra gear means that the performance down low is better, while maintaining the altitude performance.
The Spitfire was built in multiple factories, but how long did it take to get the new wing into production (for the Spit 21)?
But the performance improvement won't get the Hurricane anywhere near the Spitfire's performance on the same engine.
Historically it was the Hurricane's design team who were freed up to work on the Typhoon. It must be remembered that the Typhoon was intended to replace both the Hurricane and the Spitfire, but was unable to replace the latter.
I feel that had they given the choice to swap Hurricanes for Spitfires in that ratio (ie 2 Spitfires for 3 Hurricanes) prior to the BoB the RAF would have jumped at the chance.
Most of the Lufwaffe deployed east during mid 1941. No Spitfires might put a crimp in RAF Circus raids during 1941 to 1942 but otherwise it hardly matters.
July 1943 is a different story. What replaces the horde of Spitfires on Malta to cover the invasion of Sicily and southern Italy?
The 12/45 would give the Hurricane a big boost in performance over the Merlin III and it's cheaper and lighter than the XX, so why wouldn't they use it in the Hurricane? The Sea Hurricane, in particular would have greatly benefited from the Merlin 45, especially when 16lb boost comes along and for that matter, the Fulmar as well.
Actually, at high altitude the 45/46 should be better since it is lighter and provides the same boost levels. In any event if we compare a Spitfire Va to a Hurricane IIa, the variation in performance is not that great with the Va giving about 375 mph versus 342 for the IIa, and loaded to the same degree, the Vc (4 cannon) is only about 20-25mph faster than the IIC with 4 cannon.
Clean up the Hurricane airframe, give it a retractable tail wheel, and lighter armament (as per the Spitfire) and Merlin 60 series and I'll bet that the difference is not that great.
All this is assuming
Why not put all the time and effort devoted to the obsolescent Hurricane into developing a lightweight, single-seat version of the defiant, as was mooted in 1940?
The 12/45 would give the Hurricane a big boost in performance over the Merlin III and it's cheaper and lighter than the XX, so why wouldn't they use it in the Hurricane? The Sea Hurricane, in particular would have greatly benefited from the Merlin 45, especially when 16lb boost comes along and for that matter, the Fulmar as well.
Actually, at high altitude the 45/46 should be better since it is lighter and provides the same boost levels. In any event if we compare a Spitfire Va to a Hurricane IIa, the variation in performance is not that great with the Va giving about 375 mph versus 342 for the IIa, and loaded to the same degree, the Vc (4 cannon) is only about 20-25mph faster than the IIC with 4 cannon.
That's a very dissimilar situation, as the original Spitfire wing was already very good, so no urgency to change.
Clean up the Hurricane airframe, give it a retractable tail wheel, and lighter armament (as per the Spitfire) and Merlin 60 series and I'll bet that the difference is not that great.
Clean up the Hurricane airframe,
It would be interesting to know what a wing change could have done for the Hurricane.
Because it is cheap and easy to build and well suited to the Merlin, which is also cheap, reliable and easy to build.
The Merlin 45 is basically a Merlin XX with low gear to the supercharger left out. A bit cheaper yes. lighter by 65lbs? the Sea Hurricane would have been dismal with a Merlin 45. take off power for a Merlin 45 was 1185hp at 12lbs of boost. Merlin XX gave 1280hp at 12lb boost for take-off. Cutting 100hp from your power for a carrier take-off doesn't sound like a good idea. Throw in the fact that you loose a bit of power at higher altitudes and it really doesn't sound like a good idea. 1515hp at 11,000ft with 16lbs of boost for the Merlin 45 vs 1490hp at 12,500ft at 16lb boost for the Merlin XX.
Merlin XX engines started to be but into Hurricanes during the BoB.
Again it is only 65lbs lighter and it does NOT provide the same power levels either down low or up high. Merlin 45 used a 9.089 supercharger gear, the Merlin XX used a 8.15 low gear meaning less power used to drive the supercharge at low altitude to get the same boost and less heating of the intake charge. It also used a 9.49 high gear that took a bit more power than the Merlin 45 but meant the same boost could be held to a higher altitude.
I guess a lot depends on your idea of "Clean up the Hurricane airframe". Seeing as how the basic Hurricane I was about 40mph slower than a Spitfire I using the same engine and prop.
Designing a new airplane and just calling it a Hurricane could do wonders for improving the performance.
Hurricane airframe design (for improved performance) was basically stopped in early 1940, yet most of it's contemporaries continued development for several years after that date - which doesn't seem to raise any eyebrows.
To me the Hurricane looks like a bi-plane fighter modified as a monoplane fighter.