I'm sure I did... my knowledge of aircraft is limited even in the post-war era: I'm fine with people adding more information.
I actually meant Ki-43, but wrote Ki-27 by accident... the other designs are all valid as long as they served in the war.
What I got so far would be the following times for a 360 degree turn...
- LaGG-3: 18-19 seconds
- Yak-1: 17-19 seconds
- Yak-7B: 18-19 seconds
- Me-109F-4: 19.6 - 20.5 seconds
- La-5: 19 seconds
- Yak-9: 17-18 seconds
- Me-109G-2: 20-21.5
- Fw-190A-4: 22-23
Average degree per second rates would come out to the following
- LaGG-3: 18.95 - 20.00
- Yak-1: 18.95 - 20.18
- Yak-7B: 18.95 - 20.00
- Me-109F-4: 17.56 - 18.37
- Yak-9: 20.00 - 21.18
- Me-109G-2: 16.74 - 18.00
- Fw-190A-4: 15.65 - 16.59
The P-51's figures varies a lot owing to a lot of things.
- Long Range Escort Mission: Involves full wing-tanks, center-tank filled, and drop-tanks; by combat the center-tank is usually empty, but the wing tanks are filled
- With Drop Tanks: Starts out with the wing & drop-tanks filled; tanks come off when exhausted, or when combat starts: This means the wing tanks are either fully loaded or fairly full.
- Internal Fuel: The fuel would be drained down by combat so it would be the lightest
That strikes me as a surprise as the P-47 didn't turn very well...
Yeah, I suppose that can be taken to the point of absurdity: I could stand still jump and do a 360 in the air... some forward velocity is needed

I figure it'd be best to start out with basic data and built up from there...
- That's the general rule, I put degrees per second in there because it seemed to have a validity of it's own -- of course it runs into limits (a person doing a jump will spinning -- there 360 degrees a second
) without a forward speed.
Of course
I figured aspect-ratio would matter too
Would that be borne out in fact? I figure a fighter would just have to buzz the plane and knock it out of control.