A.G. Williams
Airman 1st Class
- 182
- Oct 10, 2020
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Hispano's were a hybrid gun. They used a combination of gas and recoil. The shorter lighter barrel helped with the increase in the rate of fire.
You also need a heavier structure to support the heavier recoil. In the P-39/63 the huge 37mm was supported by the center of the aircraft; the plane was designed around it. The German Mk 101-103 with their high muzzle velocity posed the structure problem; one of the reasons for the Mk 108."Under 5 mph speed loss on average for the cannon-armed Typhoon is hardly significant."
5mph is not significant unless the 392-393mph Typhoon IB comes into contact with the 408-410mph Fw 190A5 at 20,000ft. Fortunately for the RAF the Sabre engine's power improved.
Speed loss occurs in trifles: gun ports, wheel well covers., retractable tail wheels, gaps in the radiator etc.
The barrel length of the Hispano II became more of an issue on the Tempest (due to its slimmer wings and higher targeted speed) and the Spitfire F22/F24 series which both needed the short barrelled Hispano V.
The gun was troublesome in wing installations. The US version which used a slightly different cartridge never became reliable enough to put into service despite millions of rounds of ammunition being produced.
"
The original gun was the Mg 15 for 15mm. The design was modified with a new chamber and barrel and became the 20mm Mg 15/20.
Hispanos were anything but short: it was 93 aches long. The MgFF was 53 inches long, the M4 Browning 37mm was 89 inches long, and the Browning .50 cal was 65 inches long.View attachment 601455
Yes the Hispano's were big.
Hispano's were a hybrid gun. They used a combination of gas and recoil. The shorter lighter barrel helped with the increase in the rate of fire.
The original gun was the Mg 15 for 15mm. The design was modified with a new chamber and barrel and became the 20mm Mg 15/20.
Yes, speed and frequency to target may be similar, but unlike the solid lead of the .50 cal, the 20mm explodes on impact.The 20mm Hispano and Browning M2 had similar rates of fire, and similar muzzle velocities.
Thanks for correcting me!MG 15 was s LMG, for 7.92mm ammo.
MG 151/15 was a cannon for 15mm ammo. MG 151/20 was the 20mm version.
A bit of nit-picking: the standard .50 cal ball didn't have a lead core, it had a steel one in a thin lead sleeve. From 1944 onwards, the favoured bullet type for fighter aircraft was the M8 API; this had a hardened steel armour-piercing core with a quantity of incendiary material in the jacket tip. It was common to make every fourth or fifth round an M20 API-T (tracer). For bomber defence, the .50 often used the M21 "Headlight" tracer; it had been discovered that attacking Luftwaffe pilots could be distracted by seeing the tracers coming towards them, so the M21 was designed to have a big, bright tracer which could easily be seen from the front.Yes, speed and frequency to target may be similar, but unlike the solid lead of the .50 cal, the 20mm explodes on impact.
Supermarine and Hawker fitted the Hispano V on their fighter because the Hispano V was now available, and Hispano II was being phased out production. It offered 750 rd/min* vs. 600 rd/min for the Mk.II - so basically it was a firepower of 5 Mk.IIs for weight penalty of 3.5 Mk.IIs.
150 rounds/min faster, 30 lb lighter, and greater simplicity of installation were the main 'selling' points. The loss of 65 ft/sec in muzzle velocity was a small price to pay for these improvements -- especially with gyro sights.
It was a hybrid but with a combination of gas and blowback. Gas tapped from the barrel was used to unlock the breech, after which gas pressure in the barrel blew the fired case backwards and out of the gun.
The rate of fire was determined by a number of factors, barrel length wasn't that significant.
Supermarine and Hawker fitted the Hispano V on their fighter because the Hispano V was now available, and Hispano II was being phased out production. It offered 750 rd/min* vs. 600 rd/min for the Mk.II - so basically it was a firepower of 5 Mk.IIs for weight penalty of 3.5 Mk.IIs.
Problem with, typically, Spitfire V lugging around 4 cannons was lack of engine power for such a heavy battery. Similar problem was shared by many P-40s, P-39s and Fw 190As.
The no free lunch rule applies as ever - 5 mph speed loss was diminutive price to pay for huge increase of firepower. The Fw 190A lost same amount of speed when it swapped the fuselage LMGs with HMGs, for a very small % of increase of total firepower. Some aircraft required gondolas when wanting to go from 1 cannon to 2 or 3, with a major performance loss.
Armour penetration & kinetic energy was not high on the RAF's list. Increase of rate of fire, while saving close to 80 lbs per 4-barreled installation, was high on the priority list. Muzzle velocity of 840 m/s was still higher than what German, Soviet or Japanese 20mm cannons offered.
(my bold)
Don't post misinformation.
Source for MG 151 having a non-locking bolt? What kept the installed weight down for MG 151 was that it was not firing a really powerful cartridge vs. what Hispano used.
*in a lot of places the 800 rd/min is quoted for Hisso V
The UK deployed 3 versions of their implementation of the Hispano: the Mk I (on the Hurricane) and Mk II (On Typhoon, Spitfire and early Tempest) and Mk V which was the short barrel version of the gun on the Tempest and Spitfire F22 and F24.
Lighter reciprocating parts (or entire gun) would help the rate of fire?
Tony, since you're here - is there a manual for the Hispano V available for easy download?
Your claim is that shortening the barrel was done for reasons of increasing rate of fire rather than aerodynamics. Apart from contradicting a expert in this thread...
... there are two arguments against this:
1 The Full length US Hispano, All 2.45m of it, known as the M1 achieved a cadence of 700rpm which is 100rpm greater than the full length British versions of the same time. I'm not even sure what the ROF of the Hispano 2 was, it seems to have increased. It may have been greater than 600. The latter US M2/M3 versions were shortened like the Hispano V.
2 Unlike the Oerlikon the Hispano fired from a locked breech bolt. When the round being fired eventually passed a gas port which channelled gas back to a piston that was used to unlock unlocked the bolt. Residual gas pressure then ejected the spent cartridge casing against the bolt.
By contrast the Oerlikon's API mechanism fired while the bolt was moving forward, the mass of the bolt had to be high to slow the bolt enough and arrest the the recoil and this created a trade of between cadence, muzzle velocity and weight.
The Mauser MG151 used a short recoil. The bolt was locked with the barrel like the Hispano, however after firing the motion of the barrel unlocked the bolt after a short recoil (instead of gas). The barrel then stops quickly but the bolt continues backward (via inertia and residual pressure) to allow extraction and reloading. This mechanism has less of a trade of but it also has the advantage of firing from a closed bolt that helps synchronisation.
The Gas channels in the Hispano represent an area that needs cleaning because it is vulnerable to fouling as well as being a complication.
A combination of lighter reciprocating parts with stronger (or extra) recoil springs is the universal way to increase RoF. With gas operation (including the Hispano) a lot can be done with the location and size of the gas port: the closer it is to the chamber, the faster the bolt will unlock.Lighter reciprocating parts (or entire gun) would help the rate of fire?