Colonel Bogey
Recruit
- 2
- Feb 9, 2006
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
If I felt so inclined, I'd welcome u the same way I welcome my morning bowel movement... How about u go stick ur nose somewhere else it dont belong....Thank you for your warm welcome to the Board
Can't be bothered. I've tried once or twice myself, and quite honestly I can't be bothered. Piss on it.Colonel Bogey said:I would strongly suggest that more active policing of this practice be undertaken to avoid embarrassment/legal action against the site owner.
And this attitude is in public because ur BS reply was in public... Its common knowledge that we promote sourcing photos here (Global Message), and we dont need some nosey moron sticking his nose where it doesnt belong....This warning is in public because your remarks are in public.
Noted. I've been warned. Gotcha.kiwimac said:Les Non,
This warning is in public because your remarks are in public.
Kiwimac
Goes for me too. This reply is in public because it...just is.lesofprimus said:...and I think ur a dick for talking to me and NS in such a way...
FLYBOYJ said:But why make this an issue on your first post is beyond me unless you personnaly know the "owner" of the photo - I don't see that here.....
In Australia, the artist or photographer initially owns the copyright in their work with the following exceptions:
A photograph taken by a photographer as part of their terms of their employment is owned by their employer. (Except in the case where the employer is the proprietor of a newspaper, magazine or similar periodical, in which case the photographer will retain the right to control inclusion of the photograph in a book or as part of a hard copy news clipping service).
For a photograph taken prior to 30 July 1998, the copyright in photograph which was commissioned by a person other than the photographer belongs to that person. For a photograph taken after 30 July 1998, the copyright in a photograph commissioned by a person other than the photographer belongs to that person only if it was taken for a 'private or domestic purpose' (such as a family portrait or a wedding photograph).
evangilder said:The picture is labelled as part of Cooper's collection. Is it a known fact that Cooper took the picture? If he did, then HE is the copyright owner of the picture, not someone else. Here is the copyright law in Australia, which is where the website is hosted:
In Australia, the artist or photographer initially owns the copyright in their work with the following exceptions:
A photograph taken by a photographer as part of their terms of their employment is owned by their employer. (Except in the case where the employer is the proprietor of a newspaper, magazine or similar periodical, in which case the photographer will retain the right to control inclusion of the photograph in a book or as part of a hard copy news clipping service).
For a photograph taken prior to 30 July 1998, the copyright in photograph which was commissioned by a person other than the photographer belongs to that person. For a photograph taken after 30 July 1998, the copyright in a photograph commissioned by a person other than the photographer belongs to that person only if it was taken for a 'private or domestic purpose' (such as a family portrait or a wedding photograph).