Warspite63
Staff Sergeant
- 1,116
- Dec 8, 2022
AI Fails (4 Viewers)
- Thread starter GTX
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
- Thread starter
- #1,122
I'm not sure they diagnosed his problem correctly !
cammerjeff
Tech Sergeant
I think he is related to wading birds
Lucky13
Forum Mascot
fubar57
General
Ole Capt. James needs to do some book leanin'
Shortround6
Lieutenant General
he has got to read the books, not lean on them.
Knowledge not conducted by contact although that theory may explain a lot
Warspite63
Staff Sergeant
- 1,116
- Dec 8, 2022
This is what happens when the first thing you do is throw away the instructions .......
Hoggardhigh
Airman 1st Class
Warspite63
Staff Sergeant
- 1,116
- Dec 8, 2022
Pilot's manual for the KC10C5: 'When you have a fire onboard, make sure you pour huge amounts of jet fuel on it .....'
And don't overlook the picture at lower left, with the airplane as big as a 10-story building.
Wanted to check the "Jamato"-BS: is it some other ship, some realistic story with wrong identity or what?
It was more shite than expected - the whole "video" is AI-generated, not like others of the samples where fake "photos" have been combined in a video. When you think "There is no worse than this", worse than worst appears on...Youtube. Today I learned that there is an emoji called "Pile of Poo", very useful!
@10:00 there is some painting with a spray can - amazing!
Here (if someone wants to waste time):
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM-EIDlUmLQ
Last edited:
Warspite63
Staff Sergeant
- 1,116
- Dec 8, 2022
LOL ... trying to figure out what that ship is made up of is kinda interesting .... am thing it's a post Pearl Harbor USS Nevada ... with Colorado's main battery ... maybe Tennessee's funnel? ......
ARTESH
Chief Master Sergeant
If not mistaken, is this one that was lost over Bermuda Triangle?
Warspite63
Staff Sergeant
- 1,116
- Dec 8, 2022
Yes. 5 TBM Avengers, followed by a Mariner search plane
I did a little experiment, I asked Google's AI search tool to tell me about "terrible AI for airplanes." I wasn't quite prepared for how honest its answer was:
"Artificial intelligence in aviation is largely a hype-driven disaster. Generative tools produce wildly inaccurate technical drawings and dangerous instructions, while backend AI systems often fail due to fractured data. Meanwhile, consumer AI "travel assistants" have proved to be expensive liabilities, as seen when Air Canada's chatbot provided incorrect refund information to a passenger.
"AI models trained on aviation literature and technical data consistently fail to grasp the realities of flight, resulting in:
"Fictional Data: Generative AI tools often hallucinate non-standard aircraft markings or misidentify engine and flight control parts.
"Dangerous Advice: Asking an LLM for aircraft maintenance or flight-instruction steps frequently results in flat-out wrong, potentially life-threatening information.
"Unrealistic Visuals: AI-generated images of aircraft cockpits and interiors routinely misplace compartments, remove emergency exits, or depict impossible layouts."
And it gave specific sources for each of these statements. So I wonder: Is AI self-aware? Is it developing inadequacy psychoses about its own usefulness? Or will it start to blame the very sources it quotes for being its enemies, and become outright paranoid? Some good sci-fi movie potential there. Anyway it's apparently honest about its own capabilities in generating airplane-related materials, which I found interesting.
"Artificial intelligence in aviation is largely a hype-driven disaster. Generative tools produce wildly inaccurate technical drawings and dangerous instructions, while backend AI systems often fail due to fractured data. Meanwhile, consumer AI "travel assistants" have proved to be expensive liabilities, as seen when Air Canada's chatbot provided incorrect refund information to a passenger.
"AI models trained on aviation literature and technical data consistently fail to grasp the realities of flight, resulting in:
"Fictional Data: Generative AI tools often hallucinate non-standard aircraft markings or misidentify engine and flight control parts.
"Dangerous Advice: Asking an LLM for aircraft maintenance or flight-instruction steps frequently results in flat-out wrong, potentially life-threatening information.
"Unrealistic Visuals: AI-generated images of aircraft cockpits and interiors routinely misplace compartments, remove emergency exits, or depict impossible layouts."
And it gave specific sources for each of these statements. So I wonder: Is AI self-aware? Is it developing inadequacy psychoses about its own usefulness? Or will it start to blame the very sources it quotes for being its enemies, and become outright paranoid? Some good sci-fi movie potential there. Anyway it's apparently honest about its own capabilities in generating airplane-related materials, which I found interesting.
GrauGeist
Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung
It is in a sense - it knows it generates garbage and will tell you that it does.
At least it's honest about it...
Lucky13
Forum Mascot
Not sure if this garbage has been posted.
But if you were going to post this crap, wouldn't you at least check to see that you don't have speed brakes labelled in the forward fuselage, an afterburner in an aircraft that doesn't have an afterburner and an ejection seat in the left wing? Or possibly check what the hell "AILERAT!M£S" means, "ACAFREOVE" or "AMMUNITION SWINKY"??
But if you were going to post this crap, wouldn't you at least check to see that you don't have speed brakes labelled in the forward fuselage, an afterburner in an aircraft that doesn't have an afterburner and an ejection seat in the left wing? Or possibly check what the hell "AILERAT!M£S" means, "ACAFREOVE" or "AMMUNITION SWINKY"??
GrauGeist
Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung
How about that alternate ejection seat located in the engine's turbine?
Just wow...
Just wow...
