AI Fails (5 Viewers)

[Airborne2001]

I can't keep laugh reacting at all of these .

But yeah, wild to talk about turbojets for tanks. Again, this is another example of something be great for a sci-fi/arcadey action game, but passed off as "true" info it's .

 

[SaparotRob]

View attachment 891299

That's not how it works?

 

[SaparotRob]

View attachment 891304View attachment 891305

.. and the flux capacitor?

 

[OldGeezer]

This was just in an Instagram post talking about self-sealing fuel tanks

View attachment 891202​

Ouch! A direct hit in the mustard tank!

 

[Lucky13]

Ouch! A direct hit in the mustard tank!

Could've been worse, could've been the marmite tank!

 

[fubar57]

I replied to the post when it first came out and asked what kind of aircraft it was supposed to be and where does the pilot sit......nada

 

[Greg Boeser]

Who will survive the AI-pocolypse?

 

[SaparotRob]

Who will survive the AI-pocolypse?

Toasters.

 

[GrauGeist]

Ok, so the AI confused the M1 Abrams with the Chrysler Turbine Coupe.

Could be an honest mistake.

(yeah, ok, I know that's bullsh!t, but I had to say it...)

 

[Warspite63]

View attachment 891299

It's the Bat-Tank https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/IP0AAeSwKftn9XwV/s-l400.jpg

 

[Shortround6]

The M-1 Abrams suffers less losses than any other tank by enemy combatants sneaking up behind it on foot
Simple pivot turn produces causalities without expenditure of ammunition.
Just remember to keep safe distance in road convoys!

 

[Howard Gibson]

The M-1 Abrams suffers less losses than any other tank by enemy combatants sneaking up behind it on foot
Simple pivot turn produces causalities without expenditure of ammunition.
Just remember to keep safe distance in road convoys!

Too bad for any infantry planning to advance behind it, protected by the armour.

 

[Marcel]

More serious, I find, as a tech person myself, my opinions align with this:
View: https://youtu.be/VuXkq2r5AEY?is=aFIekuA2tcfLqGQL

 

[SaparotRob]

I fear for everyone younger than me.

 

[FulmenTheFinn]

I fear for everyone younger than me.

Honestly in my experience it's overwhelmingly the 50+ folk who get baited by AI. No offense intended to anyone.

Anyway, just watched this and thought I'd drop it here:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_vFpa1tY_A

 

[Shortround6]

Honestly in my experience it's overwhelmingly the 50+ folk who get baited by AI. No offense intended to anyone.

Hard to say what is going on.
Maybe the people under 50 don't know enough to be outraged?
There was plenty of bad history on the internet (and in books) before the advent of AI.
AI is making it worse and in more obvious ways.

 

[OldGeezer]

Honestly in my experience it's overwhelmingly the 50+ folk who get baited by AI. No offense intended to anyone.

Anyway, just watched this and thought I'd drop it here:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_vFpa1tY_A

I think honestly it might be because us Olde Folke remember the pre-digital age so well, and have some idea what we've already lost in the form of reference material that was never digitized and therefore isn't available to today's typical researcher. AI filtering and sorting and selection, on top of AI raw generation, just adds another layer of obscurance (not a real word, but it gets the point across) to people trying to learn about history. The younger a person is, the less likely he/she is to have any idea what's already been lost and what's in the process of being actively altered and deleted, so it's only logical that those of us who DO remember are most concerned. At least that's how it seems to me.

 

[FulmenTheFinn]

I think honestly it might be because us Olde Folke remember the pre-digital age so well, and have some idea what we've already lost in the form of reference material that was never digitized and therefore isn't available to today's typical researcher. AI filtering and sorting and selection, on top of AI raw generation, just adds another layer of obscurance (not a real word, but it gets the point across) to people trying to learn about history. The younger a person is, the less likely he/she is to have any idea what's already been lost and what's in the process of being actively altered and deleted, so it's only logical that those of us who DO remember are most concerned. At least that's how it seems to me.

I think it comes down to a lack of understanding of just how flawed AI is; a lot of the people sharing AI-generated content know it's AI-generated, but trust it blindly, imagining it's some all-knowing super computer. Though there are also those who cannot tell AI-generated slop from man-made content. Younger people tend to be more accustomed to AI and aware of its characteristics and limitations because they've been exposed to it at a younger age.

 

[Shortround6]

We are running into the slop multiplication factor or perhaps the slop squared factor.

There was plenty of historical slop in 1800s ( Paul Revere never made it to Lexington or Concord) and post WW Aircraft we can credit Martin Caiden with a fair amount of slop (not only him) that we can't seem to get rid of. AI doesn't seem to have any filters and just regurgitates the old slop at a faster pace into a wider pool.

 

[OldGeezer]

We are running into the slop multiplication factor or perhaps the slop squared factor.

There was plenty of historical slop in 1800s ( Paul Revere never made it to Lexington or Concord) and post WW Aircraft we can credit Martin Caiden with a fair amount of slop (not only him) that we can't seem to get rid of. AI doesn't seem to have any filters and just regurgitates the old slop at a faster pace into a wider pool.

I don't know, I talked to Caidin once and found out that he was unable to publish a LOT of what he wanted to, due to heavy censorship by the Pentagon. He clearly wasn't happy with the results, but it was the best he was allowed to do at the time, at least in certain cases.