wuzak
Captain
The pilot has to lean right after landing.
AI Fails (8 Viewers)
- Thread starter GTX
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The pilot has to lean right after landing.
Jadera
Airman
Cool, wouldn't it be more convenient just to have 3 wheels?
wuzak
Captain
Wouldn't it better to have the wheels positioned better?
Actually, for such an aircraft, we probably don't need wheels to land. Just use a skid.
Jadera
Airman
Yeah, that's what I mean, like the one wheel in the front, and the two in the back.
Shortround6
Lieutenant General
Don't worry about the landing.
There isn't enough fuel get up to take-off speed.
Aborting at the end of the runway may be a bit of a problem.
There isn't enough fuel get up to take-off speed.
Aborting at the end of the runway may be a bit of a problem.
Jadera
Airman
That's what the ejection seats for.
fubar57
General
No ejection seat unless AI puts one in
Jadera
Airman
Welp, pilot can jump out the window
Lucky13
Forum Mascot
AI would probably have the '163 powered by the tiny prop in the front and a huge wind up elastic rubber band, where the ground crew before every take off, wind up aforementioned elastic rubber band....and off you go! 
Lucky13
Forum Mascot
Jadera
Airman
Since when were radials the worst?
fubar57
General
When they're AI. Count the RR cylinders
Here's one for you. I've been working on refining XP-67 drawings and I had one particular side view that I wanted to sharpen up so that I could check something. The aircraft was off in the distance and so the image was very grainy but I thought I'd run it through the AI editing tool and see what happened. First pass with the tool that's done the best for me in family photos was bizarre, it turned an airplane photo into a closeup of a freckle faced kid somehow. So I switched tools and then the second attempt looked great, only a few obvious errors (including turning a fire extinguisher cart into a person, or maybe 2 people) that I could fix manually. I tried tweaking that image and it immediately went haywire, generating some sort of XP-67/P-61 clone. Tried again and got a P-38 bearing zero resemblance to the original image. Once more, and it popped out a DC-3 in the middle distance with lots of other planes in the background. Then came the XP-67 again, but with some other airplane's wing apparently glued to the bottom of its own wing.
Each time I was starting with the same reference image, so I guess I got lucky with my one semi-usable result. The others are just comical.
Each time I was starting with the same reference image, so I guess I got lucky with my one semi-usable result. The others are just comical.
Last edited:
Shortround6
Lieutenant General
As a rough guess (very rough) we are looking at a 22 cylinder radial of two rows judging by the cylinder spacing but since 3 to 4 cylinders are missing and host of push rods it is hard to say. The thing looks like it took major flak damage.
Not sure what the RR engine is.
A V-18? 9 cylinders in each bank?
With 11 down draft carburetors on the top?
AI is fun but it about as factual as a career Politian.
MiTasol
Major
and that appears to also be on the centreline
Warspite63
Staff Sergeant
- 1,102
- Dec 8, 2022
So it's an 'inrigger', then? ....
MiTasol
Major
Here's one for you. I've been working on refining XP-67 drawings and I had one particular side view that I wanted to sharpen up so that I could check something. The aircraft was off in the distance and so the image was very grainy but I thought I'd run it through the AI editing tool and see what happened. First pass with the tool that's done the best for me in family photos was bizarre, it turned an airplane photo into a closeup of a freckle faced kid somehow. So I switched tools and then the second attempt looked great, only a few obvious errors (including turning a fire extinguisher cart into a person, or maybe 2 people) that I could fix manually. I tried tweaking that image and it immediately went haywire, generating some sort of XP-67/P-61 clone. Tried again and got a P-38 bearing zero resemblance to the original image. Once more, and it popped out a DC-3 in the middle distance with lots of other planes in the background. Then came the XP-67 again, but with some other airplane's wing apparently glued to the bottom of its own wing.
Each time I was starting with the same reference image, so I guess I got lucky with my one semi-usable result. The others are just comical.
View attachment 895601
View attachment 895598
WOW. A photo of Alfred E. Newman as a child!
