Airforce motorcycle paint schemes of WW2

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Admiral Beez

Major
10,213
11,853
Oct 21, 2019
Toronto, Canada
Rather than the olive drab of most War Office motorcycles, the RAF sometimes had a blue paint scheme for their bikes. Below are BSA and Royal Enfield side valve singles in RAF blue, plus an overhead valve Triumph.

e79121a19148e766316f5e7b271f77c2.jpg


nE6dQR9D5-ACPcBGAYYCw%2Fs1600%2FRAFblueNortonWD16H.jpg


?u=https%3A%2F%2Flookaside.fbsbx.jpg


Did other air forces in WW2 have bespoke paint schemes for their motorcycles? What was the intent of the blue on the RAF's bikes?
 
Last edited:
The "blue" was RAF Grey, a greyish blue similar in shade to the RAF uniform colour, and was the standard colour of all RAF vehicles pre-war and up until about mid 1940.
At that time, most vehicles were camouflaged in either Dark Green, or the same with the "Micky Mouse Ears" pattern in black, or very dark, almost black, green. Dark Earth wave pattern could also be seen.
Post WW2 the Blue colour was re-introduced, up until the late 1960's/early 1970s, when NATO Green became the norm.
 
The headlamp is fitted with a black out cover, which covers the lens and has a slot to allow a narrow beam of light, with a cowl above the slot deflecting the beam of light, to reduce visibility from above.
 
Painting the motorcycles blue slowed theft by the Army or US forces.
Speed of theft depended on the trying time of the new covering paint.
I belong to the CVMG and many of our bikes do not have ignition keys. Of course most today have no idea how to work the manual ignition timing, valve lifter, manual choke, carb tickler, TDC kickstarter, and possible magneto switch of the many single cylinder British bikes made up to the early 1950s. We laugh that you're better off picking it up if you wanted to steal a wartime bike today. Here's the starting (and stopping) procedure of a 1939 Matchless from the owner's manual.


IMG_3781.png


I can see why military bikes wouldn't want keys, since you'll be looking for them in a crisis. Do modern MBTs have keys? Or planes, can anyone climb into a F-35 and steal it?
 
Last edited:
The "blue" was RAF Grey, a greyish blue similar in shade to the RAF uniform colour, and was the standard colour of all RAF vehicles pre-war and up until about mid 1940.
At that time, most vehicles were camouflaged in either Dark Green, or the same with the "Micky Mouse Ears" pattern in black, or very dark, almost black, green. Dark Earth wave pattern could also be seen.

Interesting. Was this change due to some hard earned wartime experience or tests with blue vehicles being easy targets to spot for the enemy? Or just some general precaution?

Post WW2 the Blue colour was re-introduced, up until the late 1960's/early 1970s, when NATO Green became the norm.

Also interesting. It's not like the threat of attack had disappeared in case some war had broken out again.

Those blue painted bikes do look nice, though!
 
As an aside, are all these bikes hard tails with no rear suspension except for the saddle. Isn't the handling on bumpy roads bad, to put it mildly?

Also the front suspensions look quite different than on contemporary bikes. Why do they need these forks with several rods, is that somehow part of the front suspension too?
 
As an aside, are all these bikes hard tails with no rear suspension except for the saddle. Isn't the handling on bumpy roads bad, to put it mildly?

Also the front suspensions look quite different than on contemporary bikes. Why do they need these forks with several rods, is that somehow part of the front suspension too?
The bikes are all hard tails, with the seat being sprung. The front of the seat is on a pivot, while the rear is supported by a pair of springs.
As to the front suspension, the bikes in the photos all use small diameter tubing in a truss design for supporting the front wheel. The spring is attached to the top section of what one would call the "triple tree" these days, and is connected to the bottom of the tree via a pair of levers. That configuration allows some fore and aft movement of the front wheel assembly when going over bumps and potholes and the like. The rest of the small tubes are simply for supporting the fender.
 
As an aside, are all these bikes hard tails with no rear suspension except for the saddle. Isn't the handling on bumpy roads bad, to put it mildly?
It's surprising how long it took to introduce swinging arm rear suspension. Cantilever and plunger rear suspension had some pre-ww2 application in fancy Vincent, Brough Superiors, Matchless and Ariels, but it wouldn't be until well into the 1950s before we saw oil damped coil rear springs. WW2 aircraft suspension gave the bike firms their impetus.
Also the front suspensions look quite different than on contemporary bikes. Why do they need these forks with several rods, is that somehow part of the front suspension too?
Girder forks. Lots of info here The Evolution of Motorcycle Suspension Systems: Past, Present and Future – Veritys.co.uk.

As long as you can make it oil tight, a British hard tail low compression single is a lot of fun…. at low speed. Like this 350cc 1949 Matchless G3 below. At reasonable speeds a lightweight hardtail bike like this rides no differently than a bicycle. You just need to be cognizant that the rear wheel will bounce and reduce contact on bumps when cornering.

Matchless-G3L-Right-Side.jpg
 
Last edited:
An oil tight British motorcycle?
Indeed. That's why I traded my 1969 Triumph for a 2023 Royal Enfield. You get the same simple rideability and classic lines, but keep the oil inside.


But the old Triumph was fun when she worked. Here I am in 2014.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03rsbVldKTk&feature=youtu.be
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back