Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Its interesting to note who's signed (a majority) - and, who hasn't. The whys and wherefores of that beg some questions.I don't perceive any hypocrisy on NATO's part. If anything the signatories of the cluster munitions ban are sticking to their commitment.
It seems Gerasimov has recently been replaced by a more capable general as commander of the forces in Ukraine.
At least he stays as Chief of the general staff so their military stays as corrupt as it was before
Putin sacks another top general in charge of the war against Ukraine
General Valery Gerasimov, 67, has been ousted as conflict commander and replaced by Colonel-General Mikhail Teplinskiy as Putin tries to regain control following an attempted coup.www.dailymail.co.uk
I think they have. I've seen video of a Ukrainian drone dropping several bombs that seemed larger than grenades.I agree and think that Ukraine needs to quickly get out a lot of videos of them gutting the containers and loading the bomblets on to drones.
Follow that with video of the drones dropping the bomblets into tank hatches and chimneys and trenches and a lot of the concerns will be reduced, but never eliminated.
I am surprised Ukraine has not developed drones that can carry multiple bomblets that it can drop individually as the drone follows a trench line.
Another complaint may be how the cluster munitions will get to Ukraine. Presumably they're flown into Germany or Poland, both signatories of the cluster munitions ban, and then sent by train into Ukraine. If your nation bans their export, should you turn a blind eye when they're exported through your country? I suppose the needle can be thus threaded.The criticism of the USA stems because it is allied to a whole host of NATO (and wider nations) who've banned their manufacture, export or use - and who would probably have been expected the USA administration to have paid some regard to their predictable reaction and negotiated around it or come up with an alternative.
Another complaint may be how the cluster munitions will get to Ukraine. Presumably they're flown into Germany or Poland, both signatories of the cluster munitions ban, and then sent by train into Ukraine. If your nation bans their export, should you turn a blind eye when they're exported through your country? I suppose the needle can be thus threaded.
I'm a bit confused: "between the Russian towns of Donetsk and Kamensk"?This is really good news as it shows that Russia is now keeping a lot of the missiles that would have been scheduled for attacks on Ukraine so they can use them for self defence.
Air defenses shot down Ukrainian missiles over Russian border regions, local officials claim
From CNN's Mariya Knight, Uliana Pavlova and Svitlana Vlasova
Air defenses shot down missiles in the Russian border regions of Rostov and Bryansk, local officials said Sunday.
Rostov's regional Gov. Vasily Golubev claimed a Ukrainian missile was shot down in the area between the Russian towns of Kamensk and Donetsk, adding that shrapnel partially damaged the roofs of several buildings.
Russian defenses also shot down two Ukrainian missiles over the Bryansk region, located at the northern end of the border with Ukraine, according to the region's Gov. Alexander Bogomaz.
Neither official said anyone had been wounded or killed.
Ukraine has not yet publicly commented on the attacks, and CNN cannot independently verify battlefield reports from either side of the conflict.
Attacks across the border: The governors' reports come one day after officials in the western Russian region of Belgorod reported heavy shelling that wounded two people. The region's governor said Ukraine had launched over 100 artillery shells at Belgorod over the course of 24 hours.
There have been more reports of drone attacks, shelling and incursions by anti-Kremlin Russians in the past few months as the effects of Moscow's war in Ukraine reverberate back onto its own territory.
Interesting, but he lost me with this:A sobering read:
Why China is the key to avoiding Ukraine's worst nightmare
Nobody can predict with certainty the outcome to the Russia-Ukraine war, but we can look at all the various pressures at play and then use those to try to assess the most likely direction from here, writes John Lyons.www.abc.net.au
This may well be an assumption that he is a more capable commander. Considering the quality of the troops in the Airborne Forces they have suffered huge losses and achieved relatively little.It seems Gerasimov has recently been replaced by a more capable general as commander of the forces in Ukraine.
He may be a more capable commander but that bar is set kind of low. He was born in Ukraine. As to his troops, "there aren't quite as many as there were a while ago."This may well be an assumption that he is a more capable commander. Considering the quality of the troops in the Airborne Forces they have suffered huge losses and achieved relatively little.
They did. Actually they have this capability for quite a long time.I am surprised Ukraine has not developed drones that can carry multiple bomblets that it can drop individually as the drone follows a trench line.
From a general European political perspective, they pretty much are a pariah though. The simmering military antagonism between Turkey and Greece (also a NATO member!) needs to be remembered and the European perspective and view of Turkey's recent actions need to be seen in that context. (What happens within NATO in the case of a conflict between those two nations?)Yet Turkey is in fact a NATO member as well. They are distinctly not a "lone state".
Whats the consistency of a NATO in which a majority of states have banned a weapon system as inhumane, whilst its most powerful member and largest bank-roller of military aid to Ukraine, supplies that system to an active european war zone, overtly ignoring the troubled reaction of its key allies? As previously noted, what credibility on the world stage do the nations who are signatories to the ban hold, when their land or airspace needs to be crossed to deliver those systems? How does this affect the external global perception of NATO and the rectitude of both the cause and the conduct of the war?I don't perceive any hypocrisy on NATO's part. If anything the signatories of the cluster munitions ban are sticking to their commitment.