"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (18 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

www.abc.net.au

Do Russian attacks on foreign-flagged ships in the Black Sea violate laws of naval warfare?

This week, Russia has carried out three attacks around Ukraine's southern Odesa port region, all on foreign-flagged civilian container ships, damaging infrastructure and causing multiple casualties.
www.abc.net.au www.abc.net.au

Maybe it is time for Ukraine to be given a small ship capable of carrying Neptune missiles so that they can start sinking Korean vessels supplying Russia with goods.
 
GrauGeist said:
Ok, so it's ok for Russia to employ a foreign military's troops bit Ukraine can't?

If it were the other way around, Russia would be issuing the usual nuke/escalation threat...
Click to expand...

Of course they're hypocrites. The larger message is that Russia is so afraid of spending their own lives that they're willing to weaken one of the few allies they have. Let them do that.
 
Last edited:
GrauGeist said:
I beleive that North Korea is supplying Russia by rail.

So the prime target would be the Tumen River bridge - the Russian side, of course.

Don't want to upset the Glorious Leader, you know.
Click to expand...
By ships as well and probably, this is the largest share of all deliveries. As far as I can understand, the current estimates that range up to 5 and even 6 mln artillery shells from DPRK are based on South Korean intelligence which monitors both the ground and sea traffic and counts the number of containers. Container ships arrive at Port Dunai. Satellite photos show that those vessels are loaded with deck cargo after the discharge. What is this cargo, we can only guess.
 
MiTasol said:
www.abc.net.au

Do Russian attacks on foreign-flagged ships in the Black Sea violate laws of naval warfare?

This week, Russia has carried out three attacks around Ukraine's southern Odesa port region, all on foreign-flagged civilian container ships, damaging infrastructure and causing multiple casualties.
www.abc.net.au www.abc.net.au

Maybe it is time for Ukraine to be given a small ship capable of carrying Neptune missiles so that they can start sinking Korean vessels supplying Russia with goods.
Click to expand...
There have been talks about antishipping (and anti-port) operations beyond the Black Sea in certain Ukrainian communities since the end of 2022 at least. But nothing was discussed in public.
In my opinion, to charter (or buy) a vessel is not a problem but trials of such systems can take a long time - and they should be done somewhere far, far away from the theatres of operations. Maybe drones (air or surface) are a better option than cruise missiles.
Political considerations play a role of course. How Seoul and Tokyo react if Ukraine starts blowing up ships or terminals in the Russian Far East? I don't know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 19 (members: 0, guests: 19)

Similar threads

M
Horizon Continues Development of Hybrid VTOL
Replies
0
Views
242
MIflyer
M
N
JF-17 are they worth it and can they hold their own?
Replies
4
Views
1K
RogerdeLluria
R
A
The coming $26 billion windfall for the Canadian Armed Forces. What to buy?
6 7 8
Replies
141
Views
17K
swampyankee
swampyankee
syscom3
Bust The Dragons Jaw! An interesting read on the development and use of the first laser guided bombs in Vietnam.
Replies
7
Views
2K
syscom3
syscom3
T
Asking help in determining year of Chinese military video
Replies
4
Views
1K
Weizenbrot
W
Back