Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Maybe in the "simplified" Anglo-saxon vocabulary.Disagree. An aeroplane/airplane has wings. A glider is still an aeroplane/airplane. An aircraft is any man-made object that can fly, including powered aeroplanes, gliders, balloons, autogyros and helicopters.
Agree about the lawyers, though.
You couldn't have made this stuff up. If anyone said before the invasion started, that the Russian Air Force would rely on basic low grade civilian GPS, I would have wanted to know what they were smoking.
The SU34 cockpit looks quite modern.
Sorry I just had to:Actually, I wouldn't be surprised at all. What bugs me is that people don't know their own history. The first king of the united Britain was James I who, ironically, was James VI of Scotland. And yet the British monarchy is somehow only "English". Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland also voted on devolution and got what they asked for. Can we please stop the crap about "Scotland being ruled by Britain"?
I viewed a Russian training maneuver setting up a pontoon bridge not long ago - they took almost 14 hours to do the job - for which in a NATO maneuver it would take less then 2 hours.!!! okay just a maneuver but still....In an attempt to get back on track...Ukraine claims to have destroyed Russian pontoon bridges (again) in Luhanksk:
View attachment 667907
Ukraine's military says it has again destroyed pontoon bridges that Russian troops were using to cross a river in the eastern Luhansk region, where heavy fighting has been raging for days.
The Ukrainian defence ministry published photos of what it said were destroyed Russian tanks and other armour in the village of Bilohorivka, near the strategic Ukrainian-held city of Lysychansk.
Luhansk regional head Serhiy Haidai described Bilohorivka as a "fortress" that - like the city of Mariupol - was "holding back a great number" of Russian troops.
View attachment 667908
Russian pontoon bridges were smashed by Ukrainian artillery, Kyiv says. Russia's military has not commented on the Ukrainian claim, which has not been independently verified.
Even the overly restrictive Cambridge definition of "aeroplane" fails to specify that the "wings" have to be fixed and stationary, hence rotary wings meet the definition.
We can argue til the cows come home what constitutes an "aircraft", but why bother? And any submarine larger than a midget is a ship, regardless of how much you'd like to think otherwise. The contention that the term "ship" includes the understood adjective "surface" is faulty, regardless of some people's cultural assumptions.
glider is aerodyne but not aircraft per definition....Disagree. An aeroplane/airplane has wings. A glider is still an aeroplane/airplane. An aircraft is any man-made object that can fly, including powered aeroplanes, gliders, balloons, autogyros and helicopters.
Agree about the lawyers, though.
I sheer any news on a possible reunification ? of Moldova and Romania ?
A glider doesn't meet the Cambridge definition of "aeroplane" for lack of an engine, but that doesn't preclude it as an "aircraft". The terms "aeroplane" (airplane) and "aircraft" are not directly interchangeable.glider is aerodyne but not aircraft per definition....