Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
They must just succeed to some limited degree, but at the cost of another 20,000 or more dead Russians.Crunch-time now. This is where Russia will try to pincer the defenders with some sort of envelopment.
Well they have been going through this process already since 1988 remember? First totalitarian system from the Carz's time to Soviet-time. then into the Gorbi/Yeltsin period (totalToo many very very rich men. No hope of. It will take a year or 2 or more but it will happen. Look at how the population piramide is in russia. The young will in the end revolt. It is them who are dieing in ditches in an unjust war and getting blown to pieces. It needs a spark, but that is coming i believe. You can drive Russians just that far.
Further then most people but there is an end. Look at the recent history.
They had a flight in the Ercoupe post USSR; they crashed it on takeoff.Can we start them out on the Ercoupe of democracy?
They must just succeed to some limited degree, but at the cost of another 20,000 or more dead Russians.
I think that Putin is playing the long run strategy - how this works out we will be most likely to see from july-August onward.As with any envelopment, it really depends on how fast it unfolds. I'm not seeing the Russians being able to collapse Ukrainian lines quick enough for a big bag. Speed is of the essence from the Russian point of view, but can they manage a fast offensive slice? I'm skeptical, barring a Ukrainian collapse.
I think that Putin is playing the long run strategy - how this works out we will be most likely to see from july-August onward.
Astonishingly since end of April it is actually the Russians with their limited combat and militia troops that are still gaining territory - towards a numerical and technically superior
equipped Ukraine that even holds the significant tactical advantage of being the defender, and their losses (not just the unfortunate civilians) are also mounting.
One needs to remember that the Ukrainian MoD in Summer last year already stated that it possess e.g. more ATGM then there are targets. And that Russia would need a million men to
conquer/defeat the Ukraine. This also being the reason why the Ukraine Armed Forces didn't really believe in being attacked by Russia until 24th of February.
And off course Putin and his staff also are/were aware about that.
So the question to me is rather, how will Putin in July-August onward, counter an expected Ukrainian counteroffensive with the Ukraine holding a numerical advantage of 3:1
I'm not aware of the Ukrainians having gained much land before it was first ceded by the Russians. Have the Ukrainians defeated any large Russian formations in a defended position? That's what the UAF are facing as they must now mount offensives into Russian defensive positions in the Donbas.Astonishingly since end of April it is actually the Russians with their limited combat and militia troops that are still gaining territory - towards a numerical and technically superior equipped Ukraine
Since the Ukrainian MoD and as such the western press, is very sparse with figures, not to mention "factual" figures, it is really very hard to tell as to what losses the Ukrainians haveI'm not aware of the Ukrainians having gained much land before it was first ceded by the Russians. Have the Ukrainians defeated any large Russian formations in a defended position? That's what the UAF are facing as they must now mount offensives into Russian defensive positions in the Donbas.
Yes, but not if the spoils of your victory is land when the objective was to destroy your enemy's forces. That was the failure of Germany's Case Blue, their 1942 offensive where they were supposed to repeat 1941's success at Barbarossa by encircling and destroying huge numbers of Russian forces. However in Blue's case, the Russians all withdrew and the Germans captured nothing but some farms and a few spiked oil heads. That's what the Ukrainians are doing, advances but the Russians elude them.To be fair, Sun-Tzu did opine that the best victory was won without fighting.
Yes, but not if the spoils of your victory is land when the objective was to destroy your enemy's forces. That was the failure of Germany's Case Blue, their 1942 offensive where they were supposed to repeat 1941's success at Barbarossa by encircling and destroying huge numbers of Russian forces. However in Blue's case, the Russians all withdrew and the Germans captured nothing but some farms and a few spiked oil heads. That's what the Ukrainians are doing, advances but the Russians elude them.
I think the retreat north of Kyiv was not so much in anticipation of an attack and voiding the area,
It's a good and apt reference. But how does Ukraine retake the north coast of the Sea of Azov, Mariupol and the Donbas if the Russians are dug in and now well supplied?I think the retreat north of Kyiv was not so much in anticipation of an attack and voiding the area, but rather the logistical logjam put the kibosh on further advance. In either case, it was a Russian decision rather than Ukrainian force-of-arms that resulted in that reverse. That's why it made me think of Sun-Tzu.
Боже мой, эти русские реально все наскребают - САУ 2с7 начала 70-х!! - вероятно, из-за имеющихся боеприпасов.
Нацгвардейцы Украины уничтожили российскую пушку «Пион», из которой обстреливали Северодонецк и разрушили мост между областным центром и Лисичанском.Ukrainian military destroy Russiaâs Tiulpan gun used to shell Sievierodonetsk
The members of the National Guard of Ukraine have destroyed Russia’s 2S4 Tiulpan self-propelled mortar, which was used to shell Sievierodonetsk and ruin a bridge between the regional center and Lysychansk. â Ukrinform.www.ukrinform.net
Кроме того, Хайдай поблагодарил российских пропагандистов, которые хвастались оружием и давали наводку на пристрелку.
Bridge