Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The basic concept of NATO "betraying" Russia is nonsensical, as NATO does not have nor did it ever have a position of loyalty or fealty to Russia. It may have been seen as a threat to Russia, but neither Russia nor the USSR have a history of playing nice with neighbors.There is a YouTube video from the AlternateHistoryHub. It is entitled "Did Nato Really "Betray" Russia?" It came out in March so it might be dated. It discusses, in a lighthearted way, NATO expansion. It covers some of the topics raised. I would love to link it but, you know. I would enjoy feedback on it since there is a lot of real knowledge and insight from the Forum members here. Some of you guys might also get a kick out of it.
..and that's what the video states.The basic concept of NATO "betraying" Russia is nonsensical, as NATO does not have nor did it ever have a position of loyalty or fealty to Russia. It may have been seen as a threat to Russia, but neither Russia nor the USSR have a history of playing nice with neighbors.
This post is an "oopsie"...and that's what the video states.
An alternate viewAnyone else seen Lazer Pig's video on what sank Moskva?
Yes, it includes Neptune missiles.
There is nothing like that in the genetic code of the citizens of the Russian Federation - the former RSFSR, the republic that had a very small part of its territory occupied and whose civilians suffered much less than those in the other two Soviet republics (nowadays - Belarus and Ukraine) and other countries: Poland, Yugoslavia, China...
Indoctrination is a problem and a source of trouble, not genetics. Shut down the propaganda machine, and in a couple of years, "code" will be clean again. As it was before Putin's gang came into power.
Let's spin the way-back wheel to April 25th of this year and see what the Russians had to say about things:
Russia warns United States against sending more arms to Ukraine
Russia told the United States to stop sending more arms to Ukraine, warning that large Western deliveries of weapons were inflaming the conflict and would lead to more losses, Moscow's ambassador to Washington said.www.reuters.com
Oh, it's the same "blah blah blah" about how their attacking a sovereign nation should not be interfered with and that they are the victim in all of this...
'The war is winnable': Ukrainians hopeful victory is in sight
Ukrainians are hopeful for victory after a week of massive territorial gains. Many are planning to return home, reconnect with loved ones liberated from occupation, and are setting their sights on the future.www.abc.net.au
Of course, they are.Indoctrination and propaganda seems to be common theme everywhere my friend. It's not limited to Russia.
About winter...I've said for a long time that this war is winnable for Ukraine. This offensive has shown that, as well; it has shown that the Ukrainian Army can dish it out as well as take it.
I don't, however, think it means the war will end any time soon. I think the best result from this Russian defeat is that Ukraine will be able to survive the winter solidly and hopefully launch a spring offensive to split the remaining Russian forces with a drive to the southern coast. Even then the Russians will have time to regroup and retrain over the winter, if this pans out.
Even after that, destroying the pockets will take time and blood -- and that's only if that hypothetical offensive is successful.
This war will continue, sadly, for quite some time, barring a major disaster on either side.
About winter...
Some of the major battles in the early phase of this war (which began in 2014), took place during the winter of 2014-2015.
Last winter was not very quiet either.