Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Geran-2 drones ( for my great surprise ) were carrying brackets inside made by a US owned company. Engines are from Telefly in China. I read several other components are from US companies too ( chips ? ) .
Shouldn't these companies who openly sell stuff to destroy schools and hospitals and apartments in Ukraine be made liable for these transactions ?
A lot would depend on how the parts got to Russia.
Some sources seem to indicate that many of the US parts documented in these drones were produced, and probably sold, before the war started.
T!
That is cool.![]()
Marijn Markus (@marijnmarkus)
🤯 Ukraine carried out world’s first medical evacuation of a human via drone from the battlefield the 30th mechanised brigade of Ukraine managed to save their injured comrade from a minefield. Absolutely insane. 🔍 Npte this was a modified heavy вомвeг hexacopter from Gurzuf Defence, adapted...substack.com
I think all contracts of this nature have a similar clause. But in such a clear cut situation as to who was attacked and who did the attacking would you buy weapons from a country that is doing so much to deny supplies to the nation who was attacked.If the acquisition contract contained a final destination clause, Uncle Sam or any selling country is in his right.
Apparently as USA has paid some before....but all in all USA had supported way less than any scandinavian country when measured per capita in average.I think all contracts of this nature have a similar clause. But in such a clear cut situation as to who was attacked and who did the attacking would you buy weapons from a country that is doing so much to deny supplies to the nation who was attacked.
PS I think its worth noting that the USA has been paid for some of the equipment they are refusing to supply.
I think all contracts of this nature have a similar clause. But in such a clear cut situation as to who was attacked and who did the attacking would you buy weapons from a country that is doing so much to deny supplies to the nation who was attacked.
PS I think its worth noting that the USA has been paid for some of the equipment they are refusing to supply.