- Thread starter
-
- #761
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Will do and thanks for the info, hoping to get out of work early tomorrow and wife gone for bible study. I will let you know what I findThanks Paul! Check all your 3rd BG photos and the 38th BG as well. There are many photos, where one can find something. I think you said once you have the book "The Grim Reapers at work...". I don't have it. There might be some info there as well.
Paul thanks for the addition! Both pictures are great: I haven't seen one of those with 3x0.30 in the nose at the same time. They usually have one fixed 0.50 on the right side. The camera is there, mounted in the absolutely same manner as in the other photos. These are probably the earliest modifications done in Australia, before the strafers.Afternoon Yves,
I been going through the book Harvest of the Grim Reapers by Hickey and Rogers. Found two photos that you may find interesting. Very few pictures showing all the 30 caliber machine guns installed on sides and one facing down by bomb sight. One is of course the camera though I didn't see any more info. Second one I think you will find more intersting. A ball joint used for a waist gunner and this one also looks to have a stinger in the tail shown with red arrows
View attachment 830322View attachment 830323
Hi Paul! It's an interesting idea you've shown here. But it IS NOT a refueling system. B-25 was probably too small for a tanker, I don't know. This is a fighter tow system with a "parasite fighter". But the idea was used for the development of air refueling later. It is quite possible that what we see in the photos is in fact a simulation of air-refueling with the characteristic cone.Found this on an old hard drive I had, Not sure where I got it from but some of you may find it interesting. Probably some of the first Soviet air to air refueling methods.
The "Burlak" system successfully passed the tests. They used converted, experimental Tu-4 and B-25 bombers. The engagement with them was performed by the Yak-25 single-engine pilot fighter, the first with such an index (not to be confused with the two-engine, two-seater, serial interceptor Yak-25, which appeared later!). The system was not put into service, but the work on "Burlak" served as the basis for the development of a "hose-cone" fuel refueling system. It was the refueling systems that marked the end of the towed fighter escort project. Why cling and drag an airplane when it can fly by itself, periodically refueled by flying tankers? In the case of "Burlak", we are not dealing with a flying aircraft carrier at all, but rather with a "flying tugboat", if you can put it that way. Nevertheless, the towing of the aircraft is also to a certain extent "carrying", so the towing aircraft, albeit with a certain tension, can also be included in the category of air carriers. (Google translation, not mine).
HI Paul! I too checked my copy of Kotelnikov's book about B-25 (in English), but you got the details. Here's a photo of the cone in the nose of a Yak-25 fighter. One can see the cable as well. It's not too thick but we can't judge about the exact diameter by this photo only.I wonder how thick of cable was used and how they adjusted for the weight of the cable and reel?
Cool, my copy didnt have this picture.HI Paul! I too checked my copy of Kotelnikov's book about B-25 (in English), but you got the details. Here's a photo of the cone in the nose of a Yak-25 fighter. One can see the cable as well. It's not too thick but we can't judge about the exact diameter by this photo only.
View attachment 833152
That particular photo is from the www, not from the book. I found it under "Yak-25" somewhere.Cool, my copy didnt have this picture.
Looking for information for Don's B-25 model, I came across a photo, which I downloaded years ago, but never tried to analyze. This one:Afternoon Yves,
Very few pictures showing all the 30 caliber machine guns installed on sides and one facing down by bomb sight.
View attachment 830323
I know they pulled the ventral gun turret on the C/D and installed a local fabrication for a disposable fuel tank, it was supposed to be ejected upon empty or emergency. It didn't work so well, leaking and not ejecting so it was discontinued. Not sure if that would be the rack. This would only be on the C/D as the lower gun were deleted from later modelsLooking for information for Don's B-25 model, I came across a photo, which I downloaded years ago, but never tried to analyze. This one:
View attachment 844419
The description of the photo is: "Gunner aboard B-25 bomber aiming at secondary targets on the way home from a bombing run over the New Guinean port of Madang."
At a first glance it shows a waist-gunner in a real or staged situation, some B-25 modified (late D) or not (J) etc. So far everything is wrong.
Firstly: why is the gunner sitting in a "cage" of some sort?
Secondly: is this a real 0.50 Browning or what? (compare below with a B-25H waist gunner).
View attachment 844420
The answer is simple: this is not the "normal" B-25 waist gunner we know. This one is using a 0.30 Browning, aiming trough the photographer's windows in the back of the fuselage and sitting on the camera-support, the latter being standard on B-25C/D models.
View attachment 844426
Or with other words this is the strafer-modification from the Pacific, known as B-25C1/D1:
View attachment 844434
So far the is the ONLY photo I know, showing the gunner and the rear waist his position from the inside.
Cheers!
No, this is the camera station far back - the belly turret is before it. The camera had its own round hatch and that rack is above it.I know they pulled the ventral gun turret on the C/D and installed a local fabrication for a disposable fuel tank, it was supposed to be ejected upon empty or emergency. It didn't work so well, leaking and not ejecting so it was discontinued. Not sure if that would be the rack. This would only be on the C/D as the lower gun were deleted from later models
Don, I believe we had those details before, in threads like B-25 weapons and B-25 with cameras. Photos above are from those thread, contributed by many of the knowledgeable gentlemen here. I added some from my archive as well. The LIFE-photo I started with, was really one of those gems, we see many times but kinda miss the detail.Learn more every day.
I once had more useless knowledge in my head, now i think it had jumbled up and comes out garbled and combines four different aircraft in to one conglomerate. Be careful I'll have j79 engines in a b-25 with HARM missiles.Don, I believe we had those details before, in threads like B-25 weapons and B-25 with cameras. Photos above are from those thread, contributed by many of the knowledgeable gentlemen here. I added some from my archive as well. The LIFE-photo I started with, was really one of those gems, we see many times but kinda miss the detail.
And it's good to refresh from time to time the memories. Reading my own posts from years ago, make me wonder, how much did I know....before.
Yep, you are the pro here about those things.I agree withCATCH 22 that this was a field mod. Maybe one of Pappy Gunn's ones. When you look at the gun mount that is nothing like any factory mount I have seen. Note the bolt rather than quick release pin and that the horseshoe part of the mount looks like it was just cut out with a gas axe.
View attachment 844460