Reluctant Poster
Tech Sergeant
- 1,671
- Dec 6, 2006
That would depend on wheather you define it as an indivdual aircraft or by airframe. The P-38 as an aircraft could do a number of not really related things just based on load-out. The Mossie had a lot of variations allowing particular aircraft to do different jobs but those aircraft were not redily interchangeable.
Another consideration is that the British were more inclined to build aircraft for a specific purpose, the Mossie and even the Fw-190 were excelent aircraft and so was the P-38 but none of these aircraft are directly comparable in many ways and they were all very flexible.
The Radius of operation in the ETO was defined by the 8th AF who never really supported the P-38 to its fullest capability. In the ETO the radius of operation for a P-38J was defined as up to 450mi on escort missions. In the PTO That was where the F model was limit was. In the Pacific a 2300mi mission was flown by P-38's. In the ETO the 8th never did provide the bigger 300 gal drop tanks and with a 300 gal drop tank 2,000lb bomb it was still capable of 600mi radius. Also it has been reported that P-38's with additional pylons flew with 5600lbs, the arangement consisted of several smaller bombs. With that set-up a load of three 500lbs bombs and a 300gal tank could still make that 600 mi radius. This was done in the Pacific (sometimes with rockets to).
With the contenders we have a single "Best" is really unrealistic!
wmaxt
A P-38 and an F-5 were not interchangeable! An FB VI mosquito could and did perform as many roles as any P-38
There are so many unsubstantiated claims for the P-38, I would love to see any proof that P-38s flew with 5600 lb of bombs or even a picture of one with 4 pylons.
If you put 2 x 300 gallon drop tanks on a P-38 you are carrying more fuel outside the aircraft, that means you are planning to fight with the drop tanks still on. Not a good idea in a P-38, witness Tom McGuire.