It was a lighter bomber than the bombers mostly discussed. It had less effect on the war than all the bombers discussed, and it wasn't even that good at bombing. Although it can lay claim to the Remagen Bridge.
I suppose the Ar-234 could lay claim to the Remagen bridge (it did finally crumble) but it took several raids to do so and it was never destroyed out right.
Oh, GrG. You cheap whore...and you're only 13. That was dirty, and officially below the belt. Now I'll have to try extra hard on Friday night to....'relieve my stress' so to speak.
Ok the Pe-8 can work. It is really nice and as for the area of the war was not quite what was needed. It was never able to fly from a secure and save base. 13 is a bit youn to be talking of such things yes?
But then to put it in perspective you would noly be a few short years from being the age of most of the young men in the war.
you wouldn't say that if you'd heard about these 13 year old girls i know, we;ll just say some of the stuff they've done is to rude to put on this site...................
I was inclined for the Lancaster, mainly due to the dambuster raids, But wasnt the B-29 the plane that dropped the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima? Please correct me if I am wrong, but that is what I have voted for.
I was inclined for the Lancaster, mainly due to the dambuster raids, But wasnt the B-29 the plane that dropped the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima? Please correct me if I am wrong, but that is what I have voted for.