Best Dive Bomber of WWII

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Val all the way!!! Must I remind you of what it did at Pearl Habor??? It even had a little Stuka in it. Being that it was helped designed by the same people. Biggest notice being the fixed landing gear. It also had some of the best pilots. Their hit accuracy was something like 80% at the beginning of the war.
 
syscom3 said:
Well, I have bought a book about the IJN fighter groups and aces, and so far, the Dauntless claims for the Zero's dont add up.

There were plenty of exaggerations on both sides apparently.
Click to expand...

Well what information does this book have? - compare it to what Leonard could come up with...
 
Im going to be scholarly about it. Im going to check with some Japanese warbirds experts to see what they say.

Erich inspired me to be cautious about accepting allied claims at face value.


Japanese Naval Aces and Fighter Units in World War 2.
by Ikuiko Hata and Yasuho Izawa
translated by Don Cyril Gorham.
Naval Institute Press, 1989
 
The Val had little opposition at Pearl Harbor. Didn't do too well at Midway, and was not used much after (maybe there wasn't any left?).
 
The Val was responsible for damage done to the carriers, USS Yorktown (Coral Sea and Midway), USS Hornet (Santa Cruz), USS Enterprise (Eastern Solomons and Santa Cruz).

It also inflicted punishment on the Royal Navy in the Indian Ocean operations in March 1942.

Another battle where it was used with great success was the Darwin raid of April 1942.
 
syscom3 said:
Im going to be scholarly about it. Im going to check with some Japanese warbirds experts to see what they say.

Erich inspired me to be cautious about accepting allied claims at face value.
Click to expand...

Ah! the old master inspires many!
 
Still not convinced the D3A was a better aircraft than the SBD. The Val was based on the Heinkel He-70. Here's some comparisons:
Top speed for the D3A was 267@ 20,000 ft., vs. 255 for the SBD-6 at 25,000 ft.. Max. T/O wieght was 9,519# for the SBD, vs. 8,047# for the D3A. Armament for the SBD-6 was 2 .50's in the nose, 2 .30's on a flexible mount at the rear cockpit. For the D3A, 2 7.7mm in the nose, 1 7.7 at the rear. Bomb load show a big advantage for the SBD, with 1,600# on the center rack, and up to 650# on the wings. The D3A typically carried one 551# on the center rack, with 2 132# on each wing. I think all this shows an advantage for the SBD. I am trying to evaluate only the merits of each aircraft, and not the service records, as there are usually far too many variables in combat to decisively say which aircraft was 'better'. Consider the Swordfish! On paper, an obsolete aircraft to say the least, but extremely effective in use (I give a great amount of credit to the Swordfish crews).
 
If we take tactics into consideration tahn the dive attack was obsolete from mid 42 (latest) onwards. A Dive bombing was useful in times when reliable bombsights were unavaiable. From mid 42 on, almost all air forces developed reliable bombsights and other planes began to fullfill the dive bombers original role to attack a ground or sea target with (almost) pinpoint accuracy.
SBD´s , Val´s Stuka´s began to strike without entering a dive. We should rather count them from 43 onwards as tactical bombers. Referring to dive qualities and technical abilities I expect that the He-118 could beat the Ju-87 on nearly every point, but the Ju-87 was the one to enter production.
The Vengance was better than SBD but by it´s time it almost became obsolete in it´s originally intended role...
 
The Dive bomber was the ship killer of the PTO.

The only time the dive bomber became obsolete in the PTO is when the IJN fleet ceased to exist.

I have heard that USN Helldiver's did quite well against Japanese industrial targets in the Carrier raids against the japanese homeland in 1945. In fact, they put more bombs on target than the B29's did.
 
With regard to the He-118, I think I remember reading somewhere that the main reason the Ju-87 was selected over the He-118 was because Ernst Udet crashed the He-118 prototype due to a malfunctioning variable-pitch propeller. The Ju-87 won by default. What of the Ju-187?
 
The Ju-187 was seen to have little advantage over the normal -87 and therefore was not put into production...Also I think the rotating tailfin would have been a recipe for disaster...
 
looked mighty fine though, by that point though the -87 was being used uncreasingly less for actual dive bombing and it's unlike the -187 would've done a huge ammount of dive bombing...........
 
That´s my estimation, too. The taildesign would have become a problem.
The crash of Udet, while piloting a He-118 was a ground accident.
The SBD´s could well place more bombs than the B-29 (the Stuka dropped more bombload over russia than any other single plane).
 
delcyros said:
The SBD´s could well place more bombs than the B-29 (the Stuka dropped more bombload over russia than any other single plane).
Click to expand...

That I doubt!!!! Look at the XX and XXI Bomber Command, Very Heavy Bombers (B-29) the numbers speak for themselves...
 

Attachments

  • xx_and_xxi_tons_129.jpg
    102.2 KB · Views: 210
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

A
Best WW2 Seafire vs. best A6M Zero
Replies
9
Views
1K
Shortround6
S
T
Early records of UK preparation for WWII
Replies
3
Views
720
yulzari
A
Best Axis four engined bomber?
Replies
9
Views
2K
dedalos
D
S
Request help identifying type of Bomber aircraft
Replies
3
Views
676
SaparotRob
Best "general purpose" prop fighter also capable of best high altitude performance
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
PAT303
P
Menu
Log in
Register