marseille jr
Airman
- 52
- Mar 28, 2005
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
marseille jr said:I wouldn't want to be caught in that type by p51 or p47 escort fighters though
Why not. The P-51 was not as good as everyone thinks. It was overrated and late Fw-190A were just as good
marseille jr said:Why not. The P-51 was not as good as everyone thinks. It was overrated and late Fw-190A were just as good
Yeah, me agree that the stang is a little bit overrated, but let's not drag it through the mire as it was an excellent aircraft all in all that saved many bomber crew's lifes. Btw, I didn't wanna be caught in an A becoz you would be playing the stang's game, namely contending at high altitudes at substantial speeds and finally diving away. Diving with a faster diver endowed with superior nimbleness (except rolling , ok) and 6 0.50's on yer tail isn't exactly what you might call a pleasant experience, especially when they are numerically superior, right?
The Dora was a lot more suited for this stuff as it dives formidably, but I always read it suffered from rather poor turning radius compared with the stang, at all speeds. It also forsook 2 of the A's cannons. So to say that the dora was so much better than the stang isn't quite right. I think they were generally well matched, with the Dora having the edge.
I will agree with you at high alltitudes the 51 was better then the 190A and the 51 was a good match for the 190D with the D having the upper hand. Which is why they built the Ta-152.
IV. Stab had 6 Doras and Oskar R. was able to pretty much fill in one of the old Sturm staffels with the Dora. they made mincemeat out of the Soviet fighters they encountered. 2 pilots of the staffel equipped with the bird scored something like 4 Soviet kills apiece before wars end in the D-9
Erich said:have disagree Adler about the success. the a/c was very compitent in the air and the pilots loved it. It was though just short term until the K-4 could come into full on production. The K and G-10 were so close that it is almost impossible to tell the difference in pics. The K-4 as I said had wooden tail surfaces and some even in JG 27 had wodden wing tips.
the G-10 was just an advert by the Luftw. hierarchy to take ages old G-6 frames and adapt them with the newer DB 605D engines when they were in stock and alter them with refined turbocharger, oil cooler, erlau-laube canopies, taller tail(not all the time), exteneded tail wheel(not all the time) and the typical host of Rüst. of the older G-6 version.........
if anything the G-10 was a hot rod as we have all talked about before
marseille jr said:I still have a remark about the G10 and the K4. Their airframes were designed in the mid thirties for engines with something like 650 HP. Again, I always read the airframe wasn't capable to handle the awesome pefomances of the last 109 models without problems.