Best Nightfighter of WW2

Best Nightfigher of WW2

  • Northrop Blackwidow

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Mosquito

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Beaufighter

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Corsair

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • ME110

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • JU88

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    0

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is reckoned that the P-38M would have been a better nightfighter than the P-61 Black Widow, as it was more manoeverable, faster and had better firepower. The only problem was for the radar operator, as it was a little cramped back there. But the again it was originally a single seat fighter so you can complain too much.
 
A better firepower ? 4 MG and 1 20mm-cannon (Lightning) against 4 MG and 4 20mm-cannons (P-61)......there's no question about firepower.......and thats nothing against 4 30mm-cannons of the Me 262 B
 
the lancaster kicks ass said:
the he-219 was pig ugly, no wonder they only flew it at night, the pilots wouldn't be seen dead flying it in the daytime, but i vote the mosquito.............
Click to expand...

Nope, I read about a P-51 pilot who ran into one. I t went 20 feet over his head going like hell.
 
Mosquito NF XIX or XXX - i.e. later builds with AI MkX radar and new airframes. The XXXs had the more powerful two-stage Merlines, but the XIXs had more effective exhaust flame damping (harder to see).

I read accounts in Martin Bowman's Mosquito books about Heinkel 219 Uhu's fitted with rocket motors to get aloft quickly. Does anyone know anything about these?

My understanding is that Mosquito NF vs Heinkel 219 was about even - 14 or so shoot-downs confirmed by each side. At least one shoot-down was when a Mosquito crew tracked a Uhu's rocket-type assisted take-off, watched it fire some rockets at egressing bombers (they thought it was an Me-163 Komet at first) and then intercepted and shot it down. The account also makes reference to the Uhu's ejection seats!

Does anyone have info about the jet/rocket-assisted takeoff gear used by the Uhu?
 
The RAF accounts differ from that. It posssibly might have been a Heinkel He-162 owing to the twin-tails which were similar in rear aspect to a He-219, but the crew's description was very specific...
They had enough time to ID the Bandit as He-219 and watched it go up, then down.
There were HE-219s with rocket-pods (similar to 1950s JATO). the Rocket was under, not over, the fuselage.
Maybe German records say "lost in experimental test flight"!
Sounds good to me!
 
there are no German records of lost jet powered assisted Uhu's. No He 162's flew at night and none of the Me 163's either that have cropped up in Allied acct.s. I have dealt with this for over 25 years and can find nothing in written texts from the German archivs............

will agree tha the Mossie XXX was the top dog for the RAF and the Ju 88G-6 was the top dog for the Luftwaffe. The Bf 110G-4 did it's work for most of the war, but it was too cramped, no rear warning radar for most models and the a/c needed anotehr pair of eyes to watch for the Mossie intruders. The JU 88G-6 filled that role and the Schragwaffen installation was mounted along the fuselage outdie of the cockpit where the noise in the 110 from firing the weapon was horrendous. The Ju 88 G's had a longer range which was well suited for interior of the Reich defence units, as NJG 1 gruppen still equipped in 1945 were based close to the Dutch/German border
 
Not really, the P-61 gave it a close run for its money but didnt really see the action of the Mossie to prove it better.

If only the P-38M had seen more service, then we might be singing a different song...
 
My Dad flew NF Mosquitoes with 600 Sqn.

Over Italy

After flying Beaufighter VI.f's with AI MkVIII radar in North Africa with 153 and 46 Sqns.

Of many intercepts he conducted he said that the EAC that was "impossible" to shoot down was the Ju-87 because even with wheels-down they could not fly slow enough "to get a bead on it"

Many intercepts involved Me-410s which they were instructed strictly "not to shoot down" because the Luftwaffe were dropping secret agents and the Allies wanted to know where they were parachuting so that they could be picked up for interrogation!

They once had a B-24 in their sights but backed-off thinking it was an "American party airplane" going somewhere. Maybe is was something else?!

Martin Bowman's reference to Uhu's with jet-pack described the "JATO" system as being under the fuselage, not over it as would be the case with a He-162 - though maybe the He-162 was flying inverted?!
 
cheddar cheese said:
The He-162 was a bit - no wait a lot of a disaster
Click to expand...

I will say it was an interesting concept, there's no denying that!
The idea being to make a jet fighter that almost anyone could fly. Of course, it didn't actually work out that way, but it's a fascinating idea.

Welcome, Tigger!
 
The location was chosen for speed of production, I think. So that the aircraft fuselage and engine could be manufactured at the same time in different plants, and then assembled later. That way, fuselage construction could "theoretically" carry on uninterrupted.
Of course, I'm not exactly sure what good an engineless fuselage is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

A
Best British single engined radial aircraft in WW2?
2
Replies
27
Views
3K
Shortround6
S
Second best fighter of World War II
Replies
15
Views
2K
SaparotRob
  • Locked
  • Poll
best ww2 bomber
Replies
9
Views
2K
Admiral Beez
A
  • Poll
German multiengine jet bomber best immune to Allied interception
Replies
0
Views
952
Vahe Demirjian
  • Poll
Best Biplane fighter ww2
Replies
1
Views
5K
wlewisiii
Menu
Log in
Register