Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Hi
i can't use search engine, almost until they not accept my registration, I hope they accept me in short times
Hi Vincenzo,
>HoHun can explain me why italian fighter climb speed are so different from italian test?
No idea. At which flying weights were the figures you quoted achieved?
I know that over on Aces High forum, Italian forum member Gatt and Aces High's Hitech discussed climb rate figures for some Italian fighter (of a later generation, I believe) that were too high to be realistic. Gatt had contact to a retired Macchi engineer (I believe - maybe it was an other company), and I seem to remember that after much research, lower figures were accepted as probable.
Maybe this was not type-specific, but systematic for Italian ratings and procedures?
Regards,
Henning (HoHuN)
Italian aircraft are a fascinating topic, but compared to other types, there is so little data on them that we really need your expert input here!
Regards,
Henning (HoHun)
Typhoon it's not in challenge, obviously, Beaufigher imho was not good for fighter vs fighter, also if it can match with some of more old designhawker typhoon or beaufighter,cheers.
Hi Gatt,
What is the "motorino" mentioned in some of the documents?
Regards,
Henning (HoHun)
Not without the usual problems of first-hand data of course ... did you notice that there is no increase in the quoted "autonomia" of the G-50bis despite the weight data shows it has an increased fuel capacity?