Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
surely
i add weapons in the list for "defence" was more difficult work
The second part (form "i add") is difficult for me to understand; usage of capital letters and interpunction would help.
Anyway, the only 2x12,7mm armament of the Italian fighters from our thread is only good for "low grade" of your clasification, not for "intermidiate range". Eg. among P-36, I-16 etc. The Hayabusa (Army fighter Type 1) has the same problem; Zero at least had cannons.
Also, could you provide any info why only the ground attack variants of the I-16 would carry cannons?
Bufalo, at least the version Finns flew was comparale with Wildcat.
I am slightly colour blind and I am finding it difficult to read some of the charts, but is the sustained turn rate chart trying to tell me that a Fokker G1 can turn at least as fast as a Zero. Or that a Beaufighter can turn with an F4F4 or a La-5?
If you look at the graph, the D.XXI is somewhere in the middle at climbingspeed.D XXI (Finland) level speed very low, climb low, turn good) 4 .3 mg
I wonder how much more impressive it would have been with contract built Jumo 213 engines.I was going to say the Swedish J22, first flew in '42. Managed to 575 Km/h with 1.065 engine and could hold its own against the P-51D's that we used in our airforce....
But then reason and common sense kicked in....and I'm not so sure!
I think that I'll have to go with the '190 here, just look what came out of it later, the Doras!
If you look at the graph, the D.XXI is somewhere in the middle at climbingspeed.
Yup, the G.1 is even faster turning at about 4000. This fits well with the LVA comment that the G.1 could turn as good or better as the D.XXI