Bomber v Bomber

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Its interesting to note that a number of RAF B24's had the twin 50 in the rear replaced by quad 3.3 in a Bolton Paul turret. Does anyone have any idea as to why this was done?
 
at the time we were shitting out .303 ammo, but .50cal guns and ammo were like gold dust throughout the british empire, mostly because we didn't really like the .50cal :lol:
 
Twitch said:
A Yank Spitfire pilot I know used to tell me about how the .303s humorously bounced harmlessly off of FW 190 plating.

If it was an Fw 190 F8 or A8 I think tht would be the case with most allied MG rounds....
 
I hardly think the .303 harmlessly bounced off the Fw-190, unless it was the well armoured types. Spitfire Vs and IXs in the early days of Fw-190 introduction were getting kills against them ... albeit the Spitfire V had to rely a lot on luck ...except the H.F V at low level ...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back