British poppet valve radials

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


If racking up hundreds of hours was your top requirement in the 30s then your only option was the AS Cheetah. They had 1200 hours between overhaul in the mid 30s and Pratts 985 and 1340 were still at 800 hours in the 60s. And if you want a smooth engine a radial always beats a flat engine in that period.

And also in the 30s Bristol Jupiter engines were made under licence in more countries than any Pratt or Wright (and probably than all Pratt and Wright engines combined) so they were obviously doing something very right.

And the American Bliss Jupiter was, also, a Bristol Jupiter built under licence.
 
That first video is of a Cheetah XVII or later because it has the Hoover constant speed prop and smooth cowls. Those were used on the Anson 19 and later models. This may be one of the engines from VH-BAF which went to NZ and was re-engined with Cheetah X's and helmet cowls. If so the exhaust has been made a lot longer than when on BAF.

All the others appear to be Cheetah X's from an Airspeed Oxford although some/all may be a Cheetah IX from an Anson that has been fitted with an Oxford propeller. The Anson used a Fairey Reed metal prop and those are probably very hard to come by these days. I note the Omaka Anson has a wooden prop.

The last vid is of VH-BAF after re-engining in NZ. The mods were nothing to do with making that aircraft look modern. When the wood wings and tailplanes were outlawed because of the possibility of glue delamination Terry Brain went to England and purchased some late model, metal wing, Ansons and fitted the tailplanes, wings, and everything attached to the wings except the fuselage to his Anson freighter fleet. The late model engines with their constant speed props were a far safer option for operating than the lower powered engines with fixed pitch (and therefore non feathering) props. Structurally the tailplane and wings were a straight bolt on change although there were a bunch of control, wiring and instrumentation changes required for the engines and props.

Terry kept the Mk I fuselage because the fuselages for the later aircraft had a lot of maintenance issues that he wanted to avoid.

The photos below are from when I used to maintain that aircraft in the 1980s.
 

Users who are viewing this thread