Darwin field Australian 1943

• Mar 8, 2018

• #1

Wildr1

Senior Airman

559

617

Mar 4, 2016

Some photos picked up at auction 10 yrs ago. Down under in Northwest Australia. These are all I have from this location and auction.

 

• Mar 8, 2018

• #2

buffnut453

Captain

7,979

13,086

Jul 25, 2007

Cambridgeshire, England

Great collection. Many thanks for sharing!!!

 

• Mar 8, 2018

• #3

Crimea_River

Marshal

45,496

13,517

Nov 16, 2008

Calgary

I agree.

 

• Mar 8, 2018

• #4

buffnut453

Captain

7,979

13,086

Jul 25, 2007

Cambridgeshire, England

I'm guessing the CW-22 is an ex-Dutch airframe that somehow got diverted to Australia?

 

• Mar 9, 2018

• #5

Gnomey

Globetrotting Surgeon General

Staff

Mod

69,350

8,259

Nov 28, 2004

London / Southsea / Royal Deeside, UK

www.flickr.com

Good shots!

 

• Mar 9, 2018

• #6

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

108,686

27,757

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

 

• Mar 9, 2018

• #7

fubar57

General

32,780

19,192

Nov 22, 2009

The Jungles of Canada

Great shots. The aircraft in pics 3-4 is.............

 

• Mar 9, 2018

• #8

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

108,686

27,757

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

This is a Curtiss-Wright CW-22 also known as SNC-1 Falcon.

 

• Mar 9, 2018

• #9

fubar57

General

32,780

19,192

Nov 22, 2009

The Jungles of Canada

Much obliged. Figured it was Curtis as Mark said but I was looking at the single seat version the Dutch used. Never new about a multi-seat.

 

• Mar 9, 2018

• Thread starter
• #10

Wildr1

Senior Airman

559

617

Mar 4, 2016

I beg to differ, they had both versions, I do not think they had the range to escape Java and make it to Australia. They might have been shipped to Australia the taken over by the US after the fall, but I can only speculate.

 

Last edited by a moderator: Mar 9, 2018

• Mar 9, 2018

• #11

buffnut453

Captain

7,979

13,086

Jul 25, 2007

Cambridgeshire, England

The Dutch used both the CW-21B "interceptor" and the 2-seat CW-22 in the Netherlands East Indies. The Dutch used the latter for reconnaissance, light ground attack and as a trainer for air gunners.

 

• Mar 9, 2018

• #12

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

108,686

27,757

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

However , the plane in question seems to belong to the US Army. If you make a focus on the undersides of the port wing you can notice the "ARMY" inscription. Also there is a small number 2778 on the rudder. The US stars can't be seen because of the slipcover IMHO..

 

• Mar 9, 2018

• #13

buffnut453

Captain

7,979

13,086

Jul 25, 2007

Cambridgeshire, England

Wurger said:

However , the plane in question seems to belong to the US Army. If you make a focus on the undersides of the port wing you can notice the "ARMY" inscription. Also there is a small number 2778 on the rudder. The US stars can't be seen because of the slipcover IMHO..

Click to expand...

Yes, this airframe does wear US Army markings but a number of ex-Dutch airframes were taken over by the US Army in Australia. The Buffalo below is one famous example:



Note how similar the markings are to the CW-22 in the OP, even down to the 4-digit white number on the rudder.

 

• Mar 9, 2018

• #14

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

108,686

27,757

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

That's true. Agree.

 

• Mar 18, 2018

• #15

M

mokyme

Airman

28

25

Nov 3, 2006

I'm pretty sure that the location of these photos is not Darwin but Garbutt, Townsville. Note the large hangar with control tower in the background of the DH.89 Rapide photo. That hangar is still at Garbutt airfield today. Also, the many hills and mountains in the background is not typical of scenery around Darwin.

Darryl

 

• Mar 19, 2018

• Thread starter
• #16

Wildr1

Senior Airman

559

617

Mar 4, 2016

You could be right, they were marked Darwin, so I assumed that they were. I have never been there.

 

• Mar 19, 2018

• #17

M

mokyme

Airman

28

25

Nov 3, 2006

Buffnet,

That Buffalo photo is probably in Australia too. Here is a photo of one at Archerfield in Brisbane, Australia. Markings are very similar.

 

• Mar 19, 2018

• #18

Wurger

Siggy Master

Staff

Admin

Mod

108,686

27,757

Jun 19, 2005

Poland

 

• Sep 8, 2021

• #19

H

Hornet133

Airman

15

21

Dec 20, 2009

The twin engined bi-plane in RAAF markings is a DH.84 not DH.89. Shape of the wings is very different on both types.

 

• Sep 13, 2021

• #20

nuuumannn

Major

10,149

9,444

Oct 12, 2011

Nelson

Hornet133 said:

The twin engined bi-plane in RAAF markings is a DH.84 not DH.89. Shape of the wings is very different on both types.

Click to expand...

Correct, this is one of the RAAF's DH.84 Dragons that were used for radio training among other things, A few were initially imported but De Havilland Australia built the type under licence.