Ever wonder about the Wright R-3350 TC18 Power Recovery Turbine?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Tom Fey

Airman 1st Class
133
129
Jan 24, 2009

Attachments

  • ASSEMBLED PRT 2 (2).JPG
    ASSEMBLED PRT 2 (2).JPG
    544.2 KB · Views: 5
  • PRT AND PARTS ON STAND (2).JPG
    PRT AND PARTS ON STAND (2).JPG
    830.6 KB · Views: 6
  • 167024959.jMTHJMhH.WrightR3350TCcutaway.jpg
    167024959.jMTHJMhH.WrightR3350TCcutaway.jpg
    633.1 KB · Views: 6
Back in 2001 I saw those on a Super Connie they had at Camarillo Airport. Note that it had three turbines.

I saw a video in which a former Lufthansa pilot described the Super Connie as "A three engined airplane with four engines" which gives you some indication of the engine's reliability. A friend of mine served on EC-121 crews that flew out of McDill AFB and did radar surveillance to see if there was traffic between Cuba and Nicaragua. They would shut down the two outer engines to extend their mission time.
 
A friend of mine served on EC-121 crews that flew out of McDill AFB and did radar surveillance to see if there was traffic between Cuba and Nicaragua. They would shut down the two outer engines to extend their mission time.
A common practice on Nam EW and WV weather Connies. Still used today for long patrol P-3s and EW C-130s.

Addenda: Just checked with a friend who was an E-2 driver to make sure his tales were not sea stories.
He swore on the Bluejacket's Manual that when he was in S2Fs doing long anti-sub, and later when on station in E-2s, they'd shut down and feather the port engine to extend duration, and Grumman had built in plenty of trim to make it a no-sweat procedure.
Yes, boys and girls, Official Gouge: this ain't no sh@t!!!
 
Last edited:
btw - Burt and Dick Rutan's orbital Voyager only used the larger forward engine for the takeoff and first third of the flight, shutting it down for the efficiency needed to complete circling the globe.
 
Thanks Tom. That was a good video.
In case that user didn't message, attached is the document they mentioned.

Do you have any information that can quantify the reliability of the TC18? There are numerous references to the "Parts Recovery Turbine" and the DC-7 being a "three engined plane with four blade propellers" but I suspect that does not tell the whole story.
Quite a few engines are dismissed as being terribly unreliable, but it seems that (a) adverse reports are taken as being the norm rather than isolated incidents and (b) the unreliability of the first versions is taken as typical for the later versions which could be far more reliable.
The other variable is the care of the pilot. TSIO-520s and 540s / GSO-480s etc can last only a few hundred hours with a ham fisted pilot but a careful pilot can get them to TBO and beyond with no issues.
 

Attachments

  • wright-aeronautical-division-basic-theory-of-operation-turbo-compound-engines.pdf
    8.8 MB · Views: 1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back