Evolution of warfare at work
- Thread starter michaelmaltby
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
- Thread starter
- #3
michaelmaltby
Colonel
I have no insights or knowledge in that field, tyrotom, so lets hope it's a typo.
On the other hand - if you were going to 'take out' for example the John F Kennedy (God forbid) - you would probably want to take out the support fleet as well. Massive local tsunami ....?
The reason I posted this story is because - with this development - there is really no place to hide - except in the depths, perhaps, but even that might be detected from space as 'anomalies'.
MM
On the other hand - if you were going to 'take out' for example the John F Kennedy (God forbid) - you would probably want to take out the support fleet as well. Massive local tsunami ....?
The reason I posted this story is because - with this development - there is really no place to hide - except in the depths, perhaps, but even that might be detected from space as 'anomalies'.
MM
The biggest known fuel-air explosive bomb developed by the US, the GBU-43/B has a 11 ton yield, and weighs 18.000 lbs.
The Russian FOAB ( that's for Father Of All Bombs) has a yield of 44 tons, but I can't find the weight.
This Chinese weapon has a yield at least 5,000 times greater, and it's light enough to be a ballistic rocket wathead!!! Doesn't sound feasible.
The Russian FOAB ( that's for Father Of All Bombs) has a yield of 44 tons, but I can't find the weight.
This Chinese weapon has a yield at least 5,000 times greater, and it's light enough to be a ballistic rocket wathead!!! Doesn't sound feasible.
- Thread starter
- #5
michaelmaltby
Colonel
Good perspective. Thanks.
MM
MM
