F-104 Starfighter.....

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

F-104 has my vote. Pictures do not do it justice, one has to see it in the air. I was lucky enough to see one flying back in the 80's. It belong to a collector that lived in the Houston area. He kept it at IAH for several months. I saw it one and never saw it again.

An LTC attached to my old unit was a F-104 driver. He told me they trained to fly at max speed toward a bomber formation and launch missles. If they made it through the first pass, they would roll off the top and try to catch the formation for a second pass.

DBII
 

Actually, the original reason for the "tilting" wing wasn't so that it would act as speed brake, but that it would increase the incidence of the wing when landing on carriers, thereby increasing the AoA and decreasing the landing speed. It also allowed the pilot a better view over the nose when landing, as the fuselage would be closer to level during the final approach.
 
And with respect to the F-8, you gotta love these...

""Safety" Record - a point of perverse pride. Overall accident rate of 46.70 per 100,000 hrs. (For comparison: A-4: 23.36; F-4: 20.17; F-14: 9.32). Many reasons probable, none of which include pilot inadequacy. The VIW wing (or something) made it a strange beast on final; 140 kts+/- approach speeds to a 27C; gremlins; "tiger" attitude, to close for the kill on anything, anyplace, any time, with any weapon available, apparently including the airplane. In an article in the August 2000 issue of Flight Journal, Paul Gilcrist points out that "the
accident statistics of the Crusader in the Fleet was atrocious . . . the Navy bought 1266 Crusaders during those years and at the same time, experienced 1106 major Crusader accidents. In other words, some intrepid aviator or
other crashed virtually every Crusader ever built!"

and...

"First ( only?) to execute 4 point slow roll on take off not get his wings jerked forthwith: 7 May 1958 in F8U-1 BuNo 143814. (Awarded poison oak leaf cluster for displaying extreme stupidity in the face of serious personal peril to wit, ignoring commonly know fact that maneuver would obviously be in full view of black shoe atsugi base skipper who, when he wasn't gleefully reaming perfectly innocent brown shoe folk, spent the balance of his time feet on desk sucking on pipe staring out of office window - I thought he was asleep.)"

and this beauty...

"Most Unique Ground Attack - During the 64 cruise on ranger I was a unarmed photo type with VFP-63. I was launched about 2 am in the dark night with 4 A-4s and a tanker to do photo bomb damage on a truck farm in the middle of the jungle.

The A-4s spent an hour dropping flares looking for the truck farm- while me and the tanker orbited at 20m.. I kept topping off and when the A-4s gave up and left, I had a full load of fuel and 40 million half candle power photo flash flares with 8 sec delay, that I could not bring back to the ship.

We were near route one on the west side of Nam and with a full moon the road stood out like the yellow brick road.. We knew there was a VC protected inter section just to the south. So I said goodbye to the tanker and let down to tree top level straight down the road doing about
mach 1.1... As I approached the inter section I salvoed the whole 40 flares and pulled straight up and got the hell out of there..

To this day I bet there are some VC who are still going around blinking their eyes. It was my only shot in anger !!!. Chuck Anderson"

and last but not least...

"World's Altitude Record for Launching A Paper Airplane -Test vehicle placed in speed brake well, s.b. pumped shut before start. Boards opened at 50,125 feet indicated; 11 August 1966, F-8D BuNo 147069, between Eglin AFB Cecil.

Cleanest Bomb Attack On Soviet Vessel - Med, about May 1967. 13 rolls toilet paper (unused) loaded into speed brake well (I liked that speed brake). Hard right off cat, gear up, opened boards over trawler maneuvering to force carrier to turn. No medal, but no hack either. "

courtesy of Welcome to Cloudnet!
 
All that is very nice but, might I remember the catastrophical losses of the F-104 in accidents.




Starfighter with Luftwaffe
 
The Starfighter was a pretty machine, but for most aesthetically pleasing interceptor, I have to go with the EE Lightning. You might say of the Starfighter "If it didn't make it go fast, it didn't have it", but I say of the Lightning "If it didn't kill Soviet bombers, it didn't have it". The whole thing was just a very large and powerful system for flinging missiles at bombers. There is nothing in that design that serves any other purpose... 8)
 
The losses of the RCAF were due to the type of flying originally they were nuclear strike aircraft and flying lo level at 600 knots while navigating is a tough job, on a side note originally the LW had a very poor maintainence program and after changing to a better program their losses dropped dramatically
 
Eh...wasnt only german and canadian models. There were 19 fatalities of US test pilots during its development program, and that was the F-104A, a simple good weather interceptor, not the packed multi-role F-104G. ( multirole in Lockheed minds, it wasnt suited for the task)

 
Pakistan took the F-104 into combat and I believe they lost 2, one non-combat. Spain operated the -104 and never lost one. NATO with the exception of Greece and Turkey had a loss rate of 1.81, if you factor in Greece and Turkey it rises to 2.14 - Now how about Japan? Their attrition rate average .068 through out their 20 operational history!!!

Compare these numbers with other aircraft. I think NATO operators of F-100s had over a 4% attrition rate.
 
How do you distinguish a 104 crew chief from all others? He's the one with scars on his forehead. Truth or urban legend, the wing leading edges of the 104 were near knife-edged. The 104 was fast and that was it's prime design spec. Jacquelyn Cochran held the world's speed record for a while in the 104. It didn't have any range. Basically it was an engine with flying surfaces and cockpit attached and little else. One shot at the target and it was back down for refueling. Of that period I preferred the F-105D over all other designs. I think the Double-Ugly was the culmination of all the things that went right with the Century Series up through the F-106.
 

I actually worked on civilian owned 104s and I found the leading edges weren't as sharp as advertised.

The aircraft's fall backs were a product of the design spec. Kelly Johnson gave the USAF what it wanted at the time.
 
During the mid-70's, you could stand within 50-70 ft of the runway at CFB Greenwood in Nova Scotia. Nothing could match the experience of watching a Zipper howling by right down on the deck and arcing into a zoom climb. The roar of that mighty J-79 would still be echoing in your ears as the 104 magically disappeared from sight in the clear blue sky. AWESOME!!

A very good book on the F-104 in Canadian service is, 'Starfighter', by CF-104 pilot Dave Brashow. Lots of great anecdotes, information, and pictures.

Definitely one of the most beautiful jet fighters ever.

JL
 
The F-104 seems like the plane you would see in UFO movies from the 50's and 60's trying to intercept the UFO or shoot it down. I must have seen a movie or two with the F104 in it at some point growing up, because that is what it has always reminded me of.
 

Damned near criminal. That's a serial killer cloaked with wings.
 

Users who are viewing this thread