FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
Sorry, I was asking if there was no STOVL variant if it would have a big single engine or two smaller ones. I understand that the single engine with lift fan works well for STOVL, and that the single engine negates the possibility of assymetric lift thrust if one engine goes down.
In essence I am asking how much of the F-35A and F-35C designs have been driven by the F-35B?
I have friends who were on the X-35 design team. I think from the get-go a single engine platform was considered to save weight, especially since LMCO had lift fan technology available to them. It seems from the start, there was a "one shoe fits all" concept in the design. I think the airframe shape was dictated by the F-22 (The X-35 was referred as "minnie-me" when compared to the F-22 by some LMCO folks). The designers were faced with a challenge to come up with a STOVL that had size and weight restrictions, therefore that went with a lift fan rather than a second engine. In the end I don't think it was so much of the F-35B influencing the A and C models, but rather the other way around. The "B" has gotten most of the press because it was the basis of the whole JSF program, it's the most advanced, the most impressive, the most expensive and giving the most problems.
Here's a very good piece on the F-35, showing pro and con arguements...
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/The-F-35s-Air-to-Air-Capability-Controversy-05089/
Last edited: