Fairey Albacore. Was so awful?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Good points. The Albacore was the best biplane maritime strike aircraft of WW2, which by its later entry, makes sense. Others like the Fieseler Fi 167, Yokosuka B4Y, Fairey Swordfish, Vickers Vilderbeest, Levasseur PL.107, and Douglas XT3D were uncompetitive vs. the Albacore, some so bad as not getting past prototypes.
 
Last edited:

To this list we can add the Marat, the Soviet battleship sunk in Kronstadt harbour by Ju-87 dive bombers in September 1941.
 
The Fairey is half of my fantasy CAG for Hermes when she survives Nagumo's visit to Ceylon. Six Applecores, six folding Martlets. Until a forward crash barrier and tailwheel outriders can be fitted - then it's eight Applecores, six (or eight) folding Martlets.
 
Unless you are really lucky such a small air component is just going to provide target practice service to the Japanese without them having to pay for it themselves.
The Hermes can provide scout/recon service in the Indian Ocean (or South Atlantic) looking for commerce raiders or blockade runners (surface or submarine) but trying to take part in a carrier action will probably mean it can show how to die bravely.
 
Akin to the role played by the escort carriers Battler, Begum and Shah from Oct 1943 and through 1944.


It was however Oct 1942 before German U-boats reached South African waters, and mid-1943 before their base at Penang began to become operational, allowing more widespread operations in the IO.


From memory the last German surface raider to operate in the IO was the Michel.

But others like Stier were active in the South Atlantic in 1942/43.
 
A little cherry picking here? I will do a little cherry picking of my own.
Albacore cruised faster than an SE 5A fighter flat out ( not a big surprise)
Twice the bomb load how far? The FB and BB could carry 1000lbs further than the Albacore's ferry range (no bombs)
Finns got over 1700lbs into Blenheim's

Gee, take the doors off the Blenheim or carry the bombs under the wing?
Note this a MK I. MK IVs got extra fuel and could carry 1000lbs 400 miles further than the Albacore's ferry range.

Interesting loading on a Battle.

Poor Skua, limited to a single bomb. British didn't have a bomb heaver than 500lbs until late in 1940 and then less than 200. But somehow that is the Skua's fault?

When we are dealing with planes that were cruising around 150mph it helps to pay attention to mph and KTs. B5N cruised about 15% faster than the Albacore. Or about the same speed as a TBF using long range cruise (yes the TBF could cruise faster)

I already admitted I cherry picked, but the Albacore's ability was somewhat skewed.
 
Last edited:
Unless you are really lucky such a small air component is just going to provide target practice service to the Japanese without them having to pay for it themselves.
Agreed, but as much as I'd like to pack on an all-fighter group of eighteen Martlets to give Hermes her best odds, I don't think a larger air component is feasible given size and limited consumables. Hermes will be doomed no matter her CAG if she's caught by any IJN carrier group... which if she can last until summer 1942 is increasingly unlikely.

After Midway, Hermes can likely focus on packing on the Albacores, with perhaps three or four Martlets for air defence, adding aviation assets to the CW forces fighting in PNG, Solomons and thereabouts.
 
Last edited:

Man, I hope you work in PR.

Albacore was a dud. Even if it had been an unusually good biplane bomber when it came out, it was woefully obsolete. The fact that it was a clumsy, cumbersome biplane makes it even more ghastly. And neither one nor two Vicker's K guns are adequate protection even in 1940, let alone 1943, especially when your top speed is less than 180 mph and you aren't well protected and aren't even that maneuverable! According to one report, the controls were so heavy that they could barely perform evasive action after dropping a torpedo.

The only reason they didn't lose a lot more Albacores is that unlike say, the Battle, they kept them well away from Axis fighters and flak concentrations, effectively making these aircraft almost useless except for ASW and for stuff like dropping mines, or marking targets at night. Which is why the already obsolete Swordfish had to be brought back.

Sadly the Barracuda wasn't much better either.
 
Albacore was a dud.
It wouldn't call it a dud, but I would suggest the Albacore was unnecessary. Just put a more powerful engine and closed hood on the Swordfish, like this RFAC Stringbag below, and keep the production running while Fairey sorts out the Barracuda.



Fairey's carrier bombers should have gone: Seal, Swordfish, Barracuda, Gannet. Skip the Albacore and Spearfish.
 
It wouldn't call it a dud, but I would suggest the Albacore was unnecessary. Just put a more powerful engine and closed hood on the Swordfish, like this RFAC Stringbag below, and keep the production running while Fairey sorts out the Barracuda.
That might take a while!

Cool photo
Fairey's carrier bombers should have gone: Seal, Swordfish, Barracuda, Gannet. Skip the Albacore and Spearfish.

Skip the Barracuda! and the Gannet ... is basically just an ASW plane right?
 

Too bad they never did that closed cockpit version, I'd hate to be in that wind in the north sea around the latitude of Trondheim around February on a long ASW patrol
 
Swordfish continued in service on CVEs until VE day. TBFs could only operate from CVEs that had a catapult, whereas the Swordfish could typically TO unassisted, even from a CVE and could operate in weather that would often ground the TBF.

They probably coulda flown SE.5s too, but to what effect?
 
Skip the Barracuda! and the Gannet ... is basically just an ASW plane right?
Except for anti-ship torpedo missions, so was the depth charge-armed Swordfish and Albacore. We coldwar aviation fans remember the Gannet as a ASW and AEW bird, but it was a multirole bomber by design. Given the lack of anti-surface ship targets and the improved AA postwar, it makes sense for the Gannet to focus on ASW, but for non-ASW the Gannet could carry 16x RP-3 rockets (under the wings) and 4x MC Mk.18 - Mk.21 500lb bombs internally.



Nothing wrong with the Barracuda. Just get it into service in 1941 instead of Jan 1943. Besides tweaking the Merlin, there's nothing technically advanced on the Barracuda that precludes its earlier service.
 

Users who are viewing this thread