Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
In service as a tug, the Henley was restricted to a speed of 220mph due to a high rate of engine failures. So it would have been even less effective than the Battle, I think, and still subject to the same tactical limitations.
for true the 79 was heaviest of hamp and maryland, and commonly w/o turret
SM 79? Ju 89???
I thought this thread was about light bombers? I like the idea of a re-engined Breguet 690 series, it almost looks like a twin tail Beaufighter anyway from some angles
Junkers Ju 89 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Britain could purchase rights to the cancelled Ju-89 heavy bomber in 1937. It's my impression that the design was production ready when the program was cancelled during April 1937. Substitute RR Merlin engines for the DB600 engines and put the aircraft into mass production.
Fair enough. Even though the A-20 had a greater payload then the SM.79.
If Britain had a decent ground attack aircraft during the spring of 1940 then the Allies might have held on to a portion of France and fought the German army to a stalement. That's worth a lot more then the Mosquito aircraft.If we had this 'ideal' in 1939 we might never have got the Mosquito, so maybe its better we stay as we were?
If Britain had a decent ground attack aircraft during the spring of 1940 then the Allies might have held on to a portion of France and fought the German army to a stalement. That's worth a lot more then the Mosquito aircraft.
If Britain had that attitude during September 1939 they would not have declared war on Germany in the first place. Clearly someone in London thought they had a good chance to defeat Germany.
If Britain had that attitude during September 1939 they would not have declared war on Germany in the first place. Clearly someone in London thought they had a good chance to defeat Germany.