German fuel situation and what to improve on it, 2.0

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I wonder what the authors' reply would be to these documents. Were the documents publicly available in 1987?
The first one is from AVIA-15/147, although there is a 2nd "closed" sticker which has been torn off, so its possible
it may have been kept under lock and key a bit longer. The white "closed" stickers are usually about 1990`s.


The second one is:


This one doesnt have a sticker, but the archive description suggests 30 year classification which would make it 1946+30 = 1976

These are pretty arcane files, I think its most likely they never got to reading them.
 
Something they perhaps could have done better, in forward planning, would have been to try to open up more Bitumous coal reserves, or make mining of it easier. One big issue they had was that the REALLY good aviation fuel they had "C2" which was even better than "C3", could only be made from hydrogenating Bitumous coal, Lignite, which they had more
of in active mining potentiality in the war wasnt good enough to make "C2", so they had to give up on it and make "C3" instead, which caused all sorts of major problems, in addition to it being of lower overall power potentiality.

--
"The fuel of the quality of C2 can only be produced by starting with hard coal (Steinkohle) as a feed material or at the expense of the yield and with significant effort. A complete transition with future engines to the use of C2 fuel would therefore entail a restriction of the available raw material base and thus a significant reduction in production. Considering the great effort it takes to increase the achievable mean effective pressure by fuel developments alone, achieving only a gain of 1 technical atmosphere (ata), instead by relatively simple measures, such as the application of split injection (a DVL process to inject the fuel in two stages), the knock limit curves can be significantly improved, therefore one should leave nothing untried to improve the knock resistance of the engine by such measures, to make this possible - to the highest practical extent. Engine builders and fuel manufacturers must work together and collaborate so that Germany remains superior to their enemies in terms of the quality of their aircraft."
--

For reference "C1" is basically indentical to Allied 100 Octane in composition. You can see that C3 allows higher boost than 100 octane at rich mixture
and C2 is better than both at every point.

B4 is the bog standard "87/89 octane" stuff


I dont know enough about German coal mining to know if thats something which could have been done or not.
 
Something they perhaps could have done better, in forward planning, would have been to try to open up more Bitumous coal reserves, or make mining of it easier.
Wasn't til PostWar that the Germans introduced Dragline Excavators for open pit mining. Tech was in the US before 1900 and in limited use in the UK before WWII.

Far cheaper in labor costs and overall efficiency. Worked so well, the W. Germans went to the next level, Bucketwheel Excavators
 
The Groninger gas field wasn't discovered until 1959
 


I have posted this previously
 

Attachments

  • FuelsCharacteristics.pdf
    1.3 MB · Views: 16
There was not enough bitumous coal to feed them all (required by steel industry, possible chemical, I believe Steam locomotives were using it too) so they had to use lignite to produce fuel.
I believe about 2/3rd of the Bergius production capacity was processing lignite
 
Plenty of untapped Coal
View attachment 720342
That's Lignite not Bituminous. Lignite is dirt and water with some carbon. It has half the heating value of bituminous and requires larger furnaces to produce the same power output. It has been tried in locomotives but did not prove to be not a practical fuel for locomotives. Lignite is mostly used in power plants in pulverized form. German attempts to use lignite in locomotives in the interwar period failed.
 
The East Germans used Lignite to produce Coke substitute

Hard Coal, enough to keep up prewar production. Harder to find a decent graph
 
There were close to none bitumous coal deposits in East Germany (GDR) so they had to use Lignite almost everywhere where suitable. AFAIR the coal was dried to improve heating efficiency but that also cost coal to do so. The massive use of lignite for heating also caused massive air pollution, especially in winter.
 
You have never been to the Ruhr in the 70-80 ties. Now that was polution.
 
Domestic heating was by briquettes which were produced by pressing and heating. As you note lot of energy was required to produce them.
The following link is a patent from 1940 of a better way to make lignite briquettes.
And another patent from 1926
 
Last edited:
The last stand of steam powered wagons was Sentinel in the late 30's. Foden dropped out a few years earlier
 
I posted previously on this subject. It discuses the advantages of the Bergius process over the FT process.
 
Pulverized cola is very hazardous, prone to fires and explosions.
Pulverizer Fire and Explosions |
See attached paper
 

Attachments

  • Explosion Hazards Pulverized Coal.pdf
    85.8 MB · Views: 11
Last edited:
Further North Sea oil wasn't discovered until 1969 after 3 years of exploratory drilling by multiple mobile rigs. The seabed at Ekofisk is 230 to 245 deep which is well beyond the state of the art in 1934.
Also note that Ekofisk is 200 miles from Stavanger Norway, 220 from Teesside UK and 270 miles from Emden. Even if Germany had the technology to accomplish all this the oil tanker shuttle would be a juicy target for RN submarines and surface craft as well as coastal command. Not forgetting the drilling platform themselves would be very vulnerable.
 

Users who are viewing this thread