Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
P-40 data was straight from wwiiaircraftperformance.org test dated July11, 1942.Well that's interesting, but it's not official data right? If those numbers are right for the K it looks pretty good.
It is known in internet circles as "The tallest dwarf" thread.Stop trying to hijack this thread! The title is P-39 vs P-40. P-39 fanboys have a home here. As do P-40 fanboys.
If you want to talk Martlets, start your own thread.
Not if it is an extremely tall dwarf.Tallest dwarf means it is low.
So low, you'd have to look up to see whale crap.
Stop trying to hijack this thread! The title is P-39 vs P-40. P-39 fanboys have a home here. As do P-40 fanboys.
If you want to talk Martlets, start your own thread.
A proper Martlet doesnt have folding wings, why would you do such a thing, pure exhibitionism.FM-2 s were called Wildcat Mk VI, so even your first post is wrong!
They should have kept the tricycle gear, why'd they change it?Besides, everyone knows that the Bell Airabonita, the Navy's experiment to use the P-39 as a shipboard fighter was killed by entrenched anti-groundhog factions at BuAir, even though it would have surpassed all WW2 era Navy fighters.