Ernest may have been a bit too obsessed with speed.
Agreed. While it did yield planes like the He 178, it also yielded the He 100 and He 177.
Ernest bet on the wrong horse with cooling system.
Indeed, he basically focused on drag to the exclusion of everything else.
I could be wrong but "high temperature cooling" means that the cooing system is going be operating at a higher temperature than the boiling point of water.
It is kind of ridiculous that this managed to slip past me...
The cooling system/cooling drag issues are quite involved. The concept of high temperature cooling seems to have been in the background for quite a few years before WW2 but, the resolution was slow to resolve. This stems back to air racing, where the simple lowest drag was very important and surface cooling of water coolant was possibly king. However, the simple unworkability of that in a fighter was unaccountably ignored.
It's surprising that they didn't consider that. It seemed that some manufacturers such as Focke-Wulf did factor in ruggedness moreso than others.
So, Glycol based high temp cooling came along. Engine companies seem to have ignored the fire risk, even though Rolls-Royce record the "spectacular" fires caused by glycol leaks in engine testing in the mid '30's. Additionally, the heat capacity of the Glycol was lower than water.
Wait, I thought the whole point of a coolant is to absorb heat? Wouldn't that be kind of self-defeating?
While this might reflect an ignorance for WW2 engine design: I'm curious when the US, UK, and Germans started to switch over to Glycol (or a mix of Water/Glycol) systems from water?
Unless DB figures out that their lubrication system is wrong
I thought the tendency for bubbles to form was specific to the He 177?
Also why did the RLM impose restrictions on cobalt, nickle, and chromium?
In this thread, there is no surface cooling on the He 100.
Actually it did predominantly use surface-cooling; it just had a radiator to deal with low-speed flight.
Jumo 211 was with pressurized cooling system from day one - the 'closed, pressurized cooling system'* that allowed for sea-level max of 95°C was on the 211s before the F (includes the G and H that actually pre-dated the F).
The 211F introduced the 'over-pressure cooling system'*, that upped the max temp at sea level to 115°C, and at 10000 m up to 85°C.
From what it would appear the Merlin was designed for 120-130˚C and the V-1710 was built for 125˚C so that still is a bit on the low side, but a considerable improvement from 95˚C. (I have no idea what temperatures were used for the DB601).
Very high pressures on the radiator require strong construction, without skimping on quality of material for the radiator itself and of the adjoining pieces.
And that would have been an issue of cost, war economy, and a bit of a learning curve?
Junkers circumvented the issue by the time Ju 213 arrived via 'low-pressure' radiator cooling both oil and high-pressure coolant circuits
So they used one cooler to cover both oil and engine cooling?
Big advantage in aircraft is that pressurized cooling keep the pressure and boiling point of water constant, especially at high altitudes (less dense air, less cooling effect, lower the coolant's boiling point).
I didn't factor in the outside air-pressure, but it definitely makes sense.
Each engine manufacturer will have their own specific design in regards to how the engine's cooling system will operate.
The design of the coolant flow through the heads, the placement of the water pump(s), inlets, outlets, and so on is unique to each manufacturer and even then, to each engine series.
So the engine's basic design dictates what the manufacturer can do? Is there normally collaboration between both?