MiTasol
1st Lieutenant
Welcome A lot of military intelligence of the we never admit a mistake variety on show there on your web page.
I am glad that there were no fatalities but if the RAF was like the RAAF then there is a possibility the coroner would have been supplied with statutory declarations that were full of blatantly obvious lies and the RAF would have commandeered and destroyed all the Police records as soon as the coroner made his findings based on those false documents to ensure that the facts remained hidden.
Sound far fetched?
Absolutely provable from public records that they could not destroy. In the case I am referring to I am one of a large group who believe the RAAF officers who swore false declarations were acting under political duress as one of them is an officer with a long history of being both accurate and honest. For him to swear to the Coroner that the claimed pilot and his aircraft was flying from B to A when all the public and military records related to the claimed pilot state he was flying from A to B, and to swear that the pilot was killed over a week before his actual death, when again both civil and military records, including the records he released to the press many months earlier, gave the correct date. Furthermore there were many press reports of this pilot publicly meeting senior government officials a week after the RAAF said he "died" and Air Force movement orders showing his arrival at another location the day after the RAAF claimed he died. This, to us, suggests that this officer was deliberately making blindingly obvious errors in order to ensure that the cover-up eventually unraveled. Add to that the official RAAF claim to the Police and Coroner that the engine and aircraft had the exact same serial number when everyone with any knowledge of the period knows this was never the case and it is obvious that a cover-up was done. Incidentally we have a record of what aircraft that engine was fitted to when it left the factory.
In a recent review of some of our groups evidence the RAAF now admit that our group had the date and direction of flight correct and accept our proof that there was no DNA used to identify the human remains but still claim everything else is kosher.
Other relevant facts are ignored, facts like:
- the manufacturer of an item used to identify the pilot stating that the particular item was manufactured ten years after the date the claimed pilot died, and
- a second item, made of sterling silver, that was used for identification theoretically surviving a fire that burned large parts of the engine and all structure aft of the engine for over two metres, with the object having no heat damage and no tarnishing after over 60 years years in the acidic soil with the steel parts still shiny instead of corroded away, and
- said silver item was found at almost the geographic centre of the minute excavation of the crash site even though most of the debris extends hundreds of metres downhill, and
- documentary evidence from world renowned experts showing engine and airframe components being first designed (and therefore first manufactured) a full year after the claimed pilots death.,
- add to that instruments and other components recovered from the site being from the wrong model aircraft, two sub-models later than claimed and a sub-model that was only just leaving the factory in the USA when the claimed pilot died, are dismissed as "a moot point as the pilot and aircraft have been positively identified", and
- that the "positive" forensic identification was only able to estimate the persons age and size, among other things, and claimed the last known dental chart for the claimed pilot was not the one the one in Air Force records.
And most of that extensive RAAF "review" closely reflects, almost plagiarizes, the evidence that we supplied. Naturally not one word in the report addresses the above facts.
I am glad that there were no fatalities but if the RAF was like the RAAF then there is a possibility the coroner would have been supplied with statutory declarations that were full of blatantly obvious lies and the RAF would have commandeered and destroyed all the Police records as soon as the coroner made his findings based on those false documents to ensure that the facts remained hidden.
Sound far fetched?
Absolutely provable from public records that they could not destroy. In the case I am referring to I am one of a large group who believe the RAAF officers who swore false declarations were acting under political duress as one of them is an officer with a long history of being both accurate and honest. For him to swear to the Coroner that the claimed pilot and his aircraft was flying from B to A when all the public and military records related to the claimed pilot state he was flying from A to B, and to swear that the pilot was killed over a week before his actual death, when again both civil and military records, including the records he released to the press many months earlier, gave the correct date. Furthermore there were many press reports of this pilot publicly meeting senior government officials a week after the RAAF said he "died" and Air Force movement orders showing his arrival at another location the day after the RAAF claimed he died. This, to us, suggests that this officer was deliberately making blindingly obvious errors in order to ensure that the cover-up eventually unraveled. Add to that the official RAAF claim to the Police and Coroner that the engine and aircraft had the exact same serial number when everyone with any knowledge of the period knows this was never the case and it is obvious that a cover-up was done. Incidentally we have a record of what aircraft that engine was fitted to when it left the factory.
In a recent review of some of our groups evidence the RAAF now admit that our group had the date and direction of flight correct and accept our proof that there was no DNA used to identify the human remains but still claim everything else is kosher.
Other relevant facts are ignored, facts like:
- the manufacturer of an item used to identify the pilot stating that the particular item was manufactured ten years after the date the claimed pilot died, and
- a second item, made of sterling silver, that was used for identification theoretically surviving a fire that burned large parts of the engine and all structure aft of the engine for over two metres, with the object having no heat damage and no tarnishing after over 60 years years in the acidic soil with the steel parts still shiny instead of corroded away, and
- said silver item was found at almost the geographic centre of the minute excavation of the crash site even though most of the debris extends hundreds of metres downhill, and
- documentary evidence from world renowned experts showing engine and airframe components being first designed (and therefore first manufactured) a full year after the claimed pilots death.,
- add to that instruments and other components recovered from the site being from the wrong model aircraft, two sub-models later than claimed and a sub-model that was only just leaving the factory in the USA when the claimed pilot died, are dismissed as "a moot point as the pilot and aircraft have been positively identified", and
- that the "positive" forensic identification was only able to estimate the persons age and size, among other things, and claimed the last known dental chart for the claimed pilot was not the one the one in Air Force records.
And most of that extensive RAAF "review" closely reflects, almost plagiarizes, the evidence that we supplied. Naturally not one word in the report addresses the above facts.
