Iowa vs Yamato comparison

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


Right, but with a six-knot differential you're adding 12,000 yards of range per hour. Get the hell out, track with radar, link up with support, and only then take the task to hand.
 
Right, but with a six-knot differential you're adding 12,000 yards of range per hour. Get the hell out, track with radar, link up with support, and only then take the task to hand.
Not to mention two Iowa's would never be "alone", aside from the DD escort there's always a CL or CA or two/three and probably a couple of SoDaks thrown in for good measure.
 
Actually Yamato has faster rate of fire - though very small, only about 2 seconds. But faster.
 
Thats in THEORY. In practice Yamato did the hitting and Iowa and NJ - missing. Yamato, on top of everything scored longest ranging hit on WP at Samar. Read Capt Sullivans report.
 
Yamatos radar was good for range - line was not so good. But, this is how US fats battleships were shooting as well...
 
Right, but with a six-knot differential you're adding 12,000 yards of range per hour. Get the hell out, track with radar, link up with support, and only then take the task to hand.
Iowas were considered by Navy as 31.5 knot ships during the war. Again, theory vs practice comes to mind...
 

Users who are viewing this thread