Reegor
Airman 1st Class
Excellent suggestion. While we are on the subject, let me mention another field: manual size, in MB. Sometimes I will find the "same" manual, but in a much smaller file. Usually, there is no loss in quality; it just means someone took the time to do some post-processing after scanning.
I have some 700MB manuals, so this has become an issue on my laptop with a mere 500GB flash drive.
Also, Avn-tech is working on a spreadsheet listing different editions of manuals. I have offered to help out with my own data on this subject. His purpose seems somewhat different, but ultimately there will be benefit of merging the different types of lists.
I have some 700MB manuals, so this has become an issue on my laptop with a mere 500GB flash drive.
Also, Avn-tech is working on a spreadsheet listing different editions of manuals. I have offered to help out with my own data on this subject. His purpose seems somewhat different, but ultimately there will be benefit of merging the different types of lists.
Hi Reeger
To me the biggest deficiency in the index (far greater than the date but to me that is second major problem) is which manual is being referenced - eg there are two Grumman TBM manuals - but what manuals. On a snail pace link (NBN satellite service) downloading them to find they are both pilot manuals was a waste of time.
If people put a three letter manual type code it would really hel
These days the standards are AFM for aircraft flight manual, AMM for maint manual, IPC for parts list and SRM for repair manual but even the old PN for pilot notes or POH for Pilots operating handbook and E&M - erection and maint. Even the old military -1 or -2 etc would help immeasurably.
That said I take my hat off to VikingBerserker for the fantastic index he has created and when I upload some docs (very soon touch wood) they will definitely have the 3 letter manual type and date (and TO # if applicable)
Mi Tasol