Few hours ago,
D
Deleted member 68059
posted an interesting doc in the twitter: link
The doc notes that Mustang (I ?) have had lower drag than Spitfire V, but some details can raise the eyebrows. 1st - engine type on the Mustang - the F32 is noted, and that one was the 2-stage intercooled version that XP-51J was supposed to get in 1945; obvious question is 'what engine was actually on the Mustang?'.
Then, Mustang did just 1 (one) mph more than Spitfire V, despite, at least according to the doc, it had 1150 HP at 19000 ft, vs. Spitfire V with 1130 Hp at 19500 (both values are with ram effect). Something seems amis here - the F3R engine even with full ram seems incapable of making more than 1100 HP already by 15000 ft, and if the better V-1710 is installed, like the -81, Mustang will make 390-400 mph between 17000 and 20000 ft. Mustang tests.
Any takers?
The doc notes that Mustang (I ?) have had lower drag than Spitfire V, but some details can raise the eyebrows. 1st - engine type on the Mustang - the F32 is noted, and that one was the 2-stage intercooled version that XP-51J was supposed to get in 1945; obvious question is 'what engine was actually on the Mustang?'.
Then, Mustang did just 1 (one) mph more than Spitfire V, despite, at least according to the doc, it had 1150 HP at 19000 ft, vs. Spitfire V with 1130 Hp at 19500 (both values are with ram effect). Something seems amis here - the F3R engine even with full ram seems incapable of making more than 1100 HP already by 15000 ft, and if the better V-1710 is installed, like the -81, Mustang will make 390-400 mph between 17000 and 20000 ft. Mustang tests.
Any takers?