Hello everyone.
Few words to begin. As side project for next few decades i am trying to make CAD model of P-51B as close to original as possible. At this point i am modeling engine section, and have starded to find some issuses from enginering poiny of view.
As you can see to assebly those two parts are used AN426AD4 rivets (head height 0.042 in.) and used sheet have 0.032 tickness and it should thave countersink holes for rivets. In now a days standards if we use countesunk holes in sheet, it should be ticker than rivet head. Same issue is in all carb air duct parts. Does during WW2 enginers didnt see issue in such approach, or becouse there are also spot welds, it can be done such way?
Few words to begin. As side project for next few decades i am trying to make CAD model of P-51B as close to original as possible. At this point i am modeling engine section, and have starded to find some issuses from enginering poiny of view.
As you can see to assebly those two parts are used AN426AD4 rivets (head height 0.042 in.) and used sheet have 0.032 tickness and it should thave countersink holes for rivets. In now a days standards if we use countesunk holes in sheet, it should be ticker than rivet head. Same issue is in all carb air duct parts. Does during WW2 enginers didnt see issue in such approach, or becouse there are also spot welds, it can be done such way?
Last edited: